On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> I've added some ideas to the NEON blueprint. There are now really 6
> separate tasks, broken down into subitems, so it looks like we really
> could have 6 separate blueprints, as you mentioned on the wiki page.
> I wasn't sure how to cre
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Ulrich Weigand
wrote:
> Michael Hope wrote:
>
>> Hi there. The next two weeks is where we take the technical topics
>> from the TSC and the discussions had during the summit and turn them
>> into the concrete engineering blueprints for this cycle. I've created
>
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the release
of Linaro GDB 7.2.
Linaro GDB 7.2 2011.05-0 is the sixth release in the 7.2 series. Based
off the latest GDB 7.2, it includes a number of ARM-focused bug fixes.
This release fixes:
* LP: #615972 Neon registers missing in core
Peter Maydell wrote on 05/19/2011 12:16:58 PM:
> On 19 May 2011 10:43, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > Also, some of the feedback from UDS sessions included features that
> > could arguably be considered part of our blueprints, but go beyond
> > what was originally their scope. For example, one user a
Hello Richard,
> Another one that would be interesting is the missed SMS opportunity
> exposed by Jim Huang's NEON intrinsic example from a while back.
> If we have a loop such as:
>
>for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
> {
>unsigned short foo = a[i];
>...
>a[i] = ...;
>
Thanks a lot.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 May 2011 13:20, karim.allah.ah...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > Can somebody please explain how development happens regarding qemu-linaro
> ?
> >
> > I've taken a look here [0] and If I'm not mistaken, there's no code in
> the
I've added some ideas to the NEON blueprint. There are now really 6
separate tasks, broken down into subitems, so it looks like we really
could have 6 separate blueprints, as you mentioned on the wiki page.
I wasn't sure how to create those blueprints correctly though.
Please let me know if they d
Hello,
* Sent 5 SMS related patches for review upstream.
* Backported two SMS patches from mainline to gcc-linaro and
gcc-linaro/4.6 (fixes for unfreed memory)
Thanks,
Revital
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://l
Hi,
* committed a patch that supports reductions in SLP (upstream)
* continued analyzing benchmarks: ffmpeg, EEMBC telecom, office, networking
* started to look into implementation of reverse accesses for Neon
* blueprints
Ira
___
linaro-toolchain mail
On 19 May 2011 10:43, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Also, some of the feedback from UDS sessions included features that
> could arguably be considered part of our blueprints, but go beyond
> what was originally their scope. For example, one user asked for
> GDB tracepoints to be also supported with nat
Michael Hope wrote:
> Hi there. The next two weeks is where we take the technical topics
> from the TSC and the discussions had during the summit and turn them
> into the concrete engineering blueprints for this cycle. I've created
> a page at:
> https://wiki.linaro.org/MichaelHope/Sandbox/111
11 matches
Mail list logo
