[ACTIVITY] 2011-05-06

2011-05-06 Thread David Gilbert
== Bug fighting == * Tracked bug 774175 (apt segfault on armel on oneiric) down to the cortex-a8 branch erratum bug that we found as part of the bug jam a few weeks ago (affecting the more obscure vtk package) - Richard's existing binutils fix should fix this. == String routines == * Struggled

[ACTIVITY] Weekly status

2011-05-06 Thread Richard Sandiford
== This week == * Committed interleaved load/store vectorisation changes upstream. * Merged the vldN and vstN intrinsic improvements into Linaro 4.5 and 4.6. (Thanks for the quick reviews here.) * Backported the interleaved load/store vectorisation changes to Linaro 4.5 and 4.6. This took a

[ACTIVITY] weekly status

2011-05-06 Thread Ken Werner
Hi, * finished libunwind support of detection and handling of signal frames on ARM Linux. RT and non-RT signal frames are handled for both >=2.6.18 and <2.6.18 kernels. The *test-resume-sig testcases are passing now. * briefly looked into what needs to be done in order to add 64bit __sync_* o

[ACTIVITY] report week 18

2011-05-06 Thread Peter Maydell
RAG: Red: Amber: Green: GSoC QEMU student project approved Current Milestones: | Planned| Estimate | Actual | qemu-linaro 2011-05 | 2011-05-19 | 2011-05-19 || Historical Milestones: finish qemu-cont-integration | 2011-01-25 | 2011-01-25

Fwd: Linaro forums replaced by "Ask Linaro"

2011-05-06 Thread Andrew Stubbs
There's already a couple of tools-related questions on here. We should probably make sure we monitor it regularly. This isn't to hard, once you're signed up, you can mark certain topics as 'interesting' and then you'll get email notifications when there's a post. Andrew Original Me

Re: Pushing to diverged branches

2011-05-06 Thread John Arbash Meinel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 5/5/2011 11:22 PM, Martin Pool wrote: > On 5 May 2011 18:19, Andrew Stubbs wrote: >> On 05/05/11 16:22, Martin Pool wrote: >>> >>> I filed to track >>> this. I think it will have been improved a

Re: Pushing to diverged branches

2011-05-06 Thread Martin Pool
On 6 May 2011 10:13, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > On 06/05/11 07:11, John Arbash Meinel wrote: >> >> In 2.4b? most commands that took>3min in my testing dropped into the >> <30s range because of improved ordering while walking the inventory. >> There are still a few more that can be improved a bit furth

Re: Pushing to diverged branches

2011-05-06 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 06/05/11 07:11, John Arbash Meinel wrote: In 2.4b? most commands that took>3min in my testing dropped into the <30s range because of improved ordering while walking the inventory. There are still a few more that can be improved a bit further. Any idea when these improvements are likely to hi