Re: Linaro 4.5.2 v. CodeSourcery 4.5.1

2011-04-04 Thread Michael Hope
OK. Note that these do come from GLIBC, so building GLIBC for your target using your new cross compiler should basically give you what you want. I wouldn't be surprised if there's a Scratchbox package that already provides these though. -- Michael On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Diane Holt wro

Re: Linaro 4.5.2 v. CodeSourcery 4.5.1

2011-04-04 Thread Diane Holt
Nope -- all those files came with the CodeSourcery 4.4.1 (arm-2009q3-67-arm-none-linux-gnueabi-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.bz2) -- I just don't know what CS built them from. (I suppose if I can't find out how to build them myself I could try just snagging them from my 4.4.1 toolchain and seeing if they w

Re: CoreMark over releases

2011-04-04 Thread Michael Hope
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 04:31:45PM +1200, Michael Hope wrote: >> Linaro GCC 4.5 releases vs our first: >>  http://people.linaro.org/~michaelh/incoming/releases-o3-vs-gcc-linaro-4.5-2010.08-1.png >> >> Linaro GCC 4.5 builds between 20

Re: CoreMark over releases

2011-04-04 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 04:31:45PM +1200, Michael Hope wrote: > Linaro GCC 4.5 and mainline GCC vs 4.5.2: > http://people.linaro.org/~michaelh/incoming/all-o3-vs-gcc-4.5.2.png Interesting and nice to see the positive progress, but it does seem from the picture it's hard to get a grasp of exactly

Re: Linaro toolchain integration with ChromiumOS build

2011-04-04 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 01/04/11 06:46, PANKAJ KUMAR DUBEY wrote: a) gcc-4.4.3.tar.bz2: It is main gcc source code. b) gcc-4.4.3-patches-1.2.tar.bz2: It seems like some patches after code release. The Linaro tarball should replace both of these. c) gcc-4.4.3-uclibc-patches-1.0.tar.bz2: Not having idea about this.

[ACTIVITY] Weekly status

2011-04-04 Thread Richard Sandiford
== Last week == * Finished the patch that I was working on last week to use memory operands rather than register operands in neon.md. Submitted upstream: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01996.html Among other things, this allows the intrinsics to use post-modified address

[ACTIVITY] Mar.28 -- Apr.03

2011-04-04 Thread Chung-Lin Tang
== Last week == * PR48250 / CS Issue #9845 / Launchpad #723185. Unaligned DImode reload under NEON. Went back and forth with Richard Earnshaw on gcc-patches for most of the week. The issues should finally be clear, and I think it would be better to modify the significant parts of arm_legitimize_rel