On 21 March 2011 06:01, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Jim Huang wrote:
[...]
>> The build process would be interrupted by gcc:
>> make -j4 --warn-undefined-variables -f ../scripts/build/main.mk
>> TOOLCHAIN=/tmp/android-toolchain-eabi ADD_CFLAGS="-flto
>> -user-linker-plu
== Last week ==
* CoreMark ARMv6/v7 regressions: posted another combine patch upstream,
which was quickly approved and committed. The XOR simplification one is
now approved too, but needs a little more revising of comments before
committing.
* The above two patches now bring CoreMark under -march=
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Jim Huang wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Recently, Android team is working on integrating Linaro toolchain for
> Android and NDK. According to the initial benchmark results[1],
> Linaro GCC is competitive comparing to Google toolchain. In the
> meanwhile, we are trying
Hi there. I have a custom report on top of the Launchpad tickets that
shows how old they are and if they need attention:
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/tickets/gcc-linaro?group_by=lint
I check this once a day to see how we're doing. It's useful when
deciding which bug to attack next.
-- Mi
== libunwind ==
* Had few discussions with Uli with regard to unwinding.
* Continued to learn about libunwind internals.
* The .ARM.exidx and .ARM.extbl section parser is functional but the
integration into libunwind needs to be improved. Currently there are two
seperate models that hold the i
Hello list,
Recently, Android team is working on integrating Linaro toolchain for
Android and NDK. According to the initial benchmark results[1],
Linaro GCC is competitive comparing to Google toolchain. In the
meanwhile, we are trying to enable gcc-4.5 specific features such as
Graphite and LTO
