On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> On 12/21/2010 2:12 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
>
>> Upstream faces the same problem, yet manages to move the compiler
>> forward. Since Linaro's goal is for all new developments to make it
>> upstream, we should simply live by upstream's stand
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 4 February 2011 01:12, Michael Hope wrote:
>> I've had a go with running the QEMU release candidate. Short story is
>> that it boots to a prompt against the 11.05 alpha2 release so I'm
>> happy.
>
> Quick remark:
> "# Has no serial consol
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 6:11 AM, David Gilbert wrote:
> == String routines ==
>
> * After some discussions about IT semantics managed to shave a
> couple of instructions out of a couple of routines
> * Got around to trying a suggestion that was made some months ago,
> that LDM is faster than LDRD
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> I just stumbled across this:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.debugging.openocd.devel/15584
>
> And the mentioned clock issue seems to be fixed here:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.debugging.openocd.devel/15619
>
> This is exce
