== GDB ==
* Prepared Linaro GDB 7.2-2011-02.0 release
* Committed two patches to implement LP #661253 (Improve
backtrace by using ARM exception tables) to mainline and
Linaro GDB 7.2
* Provided two follow-on fixes to the patch for LP #616000
(Handle -fstack-protector prologue code); b
=== Toolchain ===
* Organized the Weekly Release Meeting Status pages
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Status
* Organized the collection of weekly Activity
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/KernelConsolidation/ActivityReports
* Started to track Linaro events planned and approv
== String routines ==
* After some discussions about IT semantics managed to shave a
couple of instructions out of a couple of routines
* Got around to trying a suggestion that was made some months ago,
that LDM is faster than LDRD on A9's; and indeed
it does seem to be in some cases; those ca
RAG:
Red:
Amber: DATE/QEMU conference still hasn't confirmed I have a place...
Green: qemu-linaro RC2 prerelease uploaded
Current Milestones:
| Planned| Estimate | Actual |
first qemu-linaro release| 2011-02-08 | 2011-02-08 ||
Historical Mile
Hi,
* I continued to setup the pandaboad but ran into #708883
- tested vaious various hwpacks and headless images
- used different power supplies and several SD cards
- built various test kernels from the linux-linaro-natty.git
* looked into the crash utility
* https://wiki.linaro.org/
Hi,
I'm working in the Linaro toolchain team on adding ARM support for GNU
indirect functions (STT_GNU_IFUNCs). The indirect function feature
requires a new relocation type, which is typically called R_FOO_IRELATIVE.
I'd therefore like to propose a new R_ARM_IRELATIVE relocation type for
the ARM
On 4 February 2011 01:12, Michael Hope wrote:
> I've had a go with running the QEMU release candidate. Short story is
> that it boots to a prompt against the 11.05 alpha2 release so I'm
> happy.
Quick remark:
"# Has no serial console or keyboard "
...this is because you haven't told qemu "-seri
On 04/02/11 01:18, Michael Hope wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> I can't reproduce this failure.
>
> I did the build using am i686-natty chroot, but with an amd64 bit kernel, if
> that makes a difference.
>
> I did it with default configure options, so I'm going
On Friday, February 04, 2011 2:12:38 am Michael Hope wrote:
> I've had a go with running the QEMU release candidate. Short story is
> that it boots to a prompt against the 11.05 alpha2 release so I'm
> happy.
>
> It was a messy road so I've written up my train of though here:
> https://wiki.lina
