David G. requested a few packages installed on silverbell today (the
quad-A9 VE porter machine we host in the datacenter). We got dchroots
instead:
- Forwarded message from LaMont Jones via RT
-
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:02:22 +
Subject: [rt.admin.canonical.com #42662] Simple packag
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:40:34AM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> As an extension of that idea, and tying into the idea of optimizing for
> size, I suspect that we (a) ought be optimizing for size automatically
> in cold code, and (b) that we're probably not doing a great job of
> optimizing for siz
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 05:57:57PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> * More ARM testing of binutils support for STT_GNU_IFUNC.
>
> * Implemented the GLIBC support for STT_GNU_IFUNC. Simple ARM testcases
> seem to run correctly.
Coincidentally I was reading about this exact feature at
http
On 11/26/2010 3:11 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> As we discussed on Monday, I think it might be helpful to get a number
> of knowledgeable people together on a call to discuss GCC optimization
> opportunities.
I'm not sure I qualify as knowledgeable, and my schedule is a mess, so
please don't try to
== This week ==
* More ARM testing of binutils support for STT_GNU_IFUNC.
* Implemented the GLIBC support for STT_GNU_IFUNC. Simple ARM testcases
seem to run correctly.
* Ran the GLIBC testsuite -- which includes some ifunc coverage --
but haven't analysed the results yet.
* Started lookin
Hi,
* the ARM __sync_* glibc-ports patch was accepted upstream
* posted proposal for consolidating sync primitives but stdatomic seems to be
the future
* used my small gcc testsuite patch to verify __sync_* support of the gcc-
linaro
* created:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain
Hand crafted a simple strchr and comparing it with Libc:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Benchmarks/InitialStrchr
It's interesting it's significantly faster than libc's on A9's, but on
A8's it's slower for large sizes. I've not really looked why yet; my
implementation is just the
Hi All,
As we discussed on Monday, I think it might be helpful to get a number
of knowledgeable people together on a call to discuss GCC optimization
opportunities.
So, I'd like to get some idea of who would like to attend, and we'll try
to find a slot we can all make. I'm on vacation next w
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Michael Hope
>> wrote:
>>> It's a bit of a newbie question, but I've been wondering if you can
>>> intermix hard float VFPv3-D16 code with V
