Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-31 Thread bfoman
lps. Best regards. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-suggestion-for-weekly-bug-summary-tp4138113p4138404.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-31 Thread Joel Madero
On 01/31/2015 06:12 AM, bfoman wrote: > jmadero wrote >> and try to figure out how that >> page is generated. I triedcouldn't find it for the life of me :-/ > Hi! > It is quite easy - it is implemented as Extension. The page template is > extensions/WeeklyBugSummary/template/en/default/pages/w

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-31 Thread Joel Madero
Top posting just to say thanks! Best, Joel On 01/31/2015 04:28 AM, Robinson Tryon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen > wrote: >> Nope. Bugzilla is Infra. Infra is on Redmine. > Here are the Bugzilla bugs on redmine: > https://redmine.documentfoundation.org/projects/infra

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-31 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 3:12 PM, bfoman wrote: > BTW: I would like to see Bugzilla custom changes announcements (with > rationale when needed) somewhere else than only in git repo at > https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=bugzilla.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/tdf-4.4.6. Yep, sounds good to me!

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-31 Thread bfoman
-- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-suggestion-for-weekly-bug-summary-tp4138113p4138376.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-31 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Nope. Bugzilla is Infra. Infra is on Redmine. Here are the Bugzilla bugs on redmine: https://redmine.documentfoundation.org/projects/infrastructure/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&set_filter=1&f%5B%5D=status_id&op%5Bstatus_id%5D=o&f%5B%5D=category

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-31 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 04:14:24PM -0800, Joel Madero wrote: >> I've never been a fan of this split to begin with. Having a much less >> visible means of suggesting enhancement requests or bugs pretty much >> just sucks. Just speaking for

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-31 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Joel Madero wrote: >>> I agree that it would be good & it is possible. >> Can I change add a query myself to that page? > So you can clone our instance of bugzilla: git clone > git://gerrit.libreoffice.org/bugzilla and try to figure out how that > page is generated

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-30 Thread Joel Madero
On 01/29/2015 10:56 PM, Cor Nouws wrote: > Hi Joel, > > Joel Madero wrote on 30-01-15 00:13: > >>> Would that be good & possible? >> I agree that it would be good & it is possible. > Can I change add a query myself to that page? So you can clone our instance of bugzilla: git clone git://gerrit.li

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-30 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 07:56:57AM +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > Joel Madero wrote on 30-01-15 00:13: > > >> Would that be good & possible? > > > > I agree that it would be good & it is possible. > > Can I change add a query myself to that page? Just a note hinting at what should be obvious: If we

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-29 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Joel, Joel Madero wrote on 30-01-15 00:13: >> Would that be good & possible? > > I agree that it would be good & it is possible. Can I change add a query myself to that page? Cheers, Cor -- Cor Nouws GPD key ID: 0xB13480A6 - 591A 30A7 36A0 CE3C 3D28 A038 E49D 7365 B134 80A6 - vrijwilli

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-29 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 04:14:24PM -0800, Joel Madero wrote: > I've never been a fan of this split to begin with. Having a much less > visible means of suggesting enhancement requests or bugs pretty much > just sucks. Just speaking for myself, I'm very unlikely to report any > enhancement requ

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-29 Thread Joel Madero
On 01/29/2015 04:01 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 03:13:18PM -0800, Joel Madero wrote: >> I agree that it would be good & it is possible. I highly recommend we >> create a new product "bugzilla" where we can easily track these >> enhancement requests...else they ar

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-29 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 03:13:18PM -0800, Joel Madero wrote: > I agree that it would be good & it is possible. I highly recommend we > create a new product "bugzilla" where we can easily track these > enhancement requests...else they are likely to get lost in the abyss. Nope. Bugzilla is Infr

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-29 Thread Joel Madero
On 01/29/2015 09:20 AM, Cor Nouws wrote: > Hi all, > > Some time back I thought that it might be good to also show the amount > of times people commented to an issue. As some rough indicator for > triage/activity other then closing an issue > https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/page.cgi?id=weekl

[Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-29 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi all, Some time back I thought that it might be good to also show the amount of times people commented to an issue. As some rough indicator for triage/activity other then closing an issue https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/page.cgi?id=weekly-bug-summary.html Would that be good & possible? C