Yifan Jiang píše v St 16. 11. 2011 v 14:48 +0800:
> 4. The amount of how many localization is another concern. In the new scheme,
> for each priority we will have "7 components * 4 locale * 4 priority" (112)
> groups. If I understand it right, when there are 10 locales, the number will
> be 280 ?!
Hi,
> 4. The amount of how many localization is another concern. In the new scheme,
> for each priority we will have "7 components * 4 locale * 4 priority" (112)
> groups. If I understand it right, when there are 10 locales, the number will
> be 2800 ?!
Sorry for bring shocking, s/2800/280 :)
Be
Hi Rimas and Petr,
Thanks for the great discussion :) I appreciate Rimas' new scheme with some
questions remaining. Let me take the opportunity to give a mid term summary
and share my thoughts based on the new scheme.
1. Firstly through the complicated mail thread, I feel it is necessary to
clari
Rimas Kudelis píše v Út 15. 11. 2011 v 18:21 +0200:
> 2011.11.15 17:30, Petr Mladek rašė:
> I didn't say they have to be translated word-to-word. They should be
> *localized*, and I would expect a localized testcase to suggest
> localized number and date formats and other stuff.
I see.
Well anoth
Hi Petr,
2011.11.15 17:30, Petr Mladek rašė:
> Rimas Kudelis píše v Út 15. 11. 2011 v 13:43 +0200:
>> Also, maybe I shouldn't look that far into future, but I hope that
>> there will come a day when proper localization of testcases will be
>> possible (that is, instead of creating a clone of te
Rimas Kudelis píše v Út 15. 11. 2011 v 13:43 +0200:
> Hi all,
>
> I took a quick look at how testruns are created and what we can and
> cannot choose when creating a testrun. My suggestion is based on the
> fact that each testrun comprises of
>
> * all subgroups in
> * one or more testgroups in
>
Hi guys,
first, I am sorry that this mail does react on the last mail from
Rimas. I started to write this replay in the morning. I had to
interrupt it for some reasons. I think that the ideas mentioned below
still make sense. Though, I might change my preference after reading
Rimas's reply.
Yifa
Hi Petr, Rimas and all,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:25:28PM +0200, Rimas Kudelis wrote:
> >> That is to say, even before we sort out how order of the test cases
> >> could be implemented, we can always create specific test runs on
> >> demand via the information of the priority "tags".
> > BTW: Ho
On 2011.11.14 12:28, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Yifan Jiang píše v Ne 13. 11. 2011 v 18:46 +0800:
>> For example:
>>
>> #EN - w001 xxx
>>
>> is supposed to have the same content with (but in different version of
>> language):
>>
>> #FR - w001 xxx
>> #DE - w001 xxx
>> #pt-BR - w001 xxx
>>
2011.11.14 12:07, Petr Mladek rašė:
> Rimas Kudelis píše v So 12. 11. 2011 v 22:46 +0200:
>> 2011.11.11 22:14, Petr Mladek rašė:
>>> The list of existing test cases looks the following way in Litmus:
>>>
>>> id # testcase summary # subgroup
>>> ---
Yifan Jiang píše v Ne 13. 11. 2011 v 18:46 +0800:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:46:48PM +0200, Rimas Kudelis wrote:
> For example:
>
> #EN - w001 xxx
>
> is supposed to have the same content with (but in different version of
> language):
>
> #FR - w001 xxx
> #DE - w001 xxx
> #pt-B
Rimas Kudelis píše v So 12. 11. 2011 v 22:46 +0200:
> 2011.11.11 22:14, Petr Mladek rašė:
> > The list of existing test cases looks the following way in Litmus:
> >
> > id # testcase summary # subgroup
> > --
Hi Rimas, Petr and all,
Thanks for the nice discussions, my ideas as follows :)
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:46:48PM +0200, Rimas Kudelis wrote:
> This is thus irrelevant, cause there's nothing to modify. :)
>
> > 2. I am not sure what is the meaning of the numbers 001, 002, 003.
> >
> >It loo
Hello Petr, and everyone,
2011.11.11 22:14, Petr Mladek rašė:
> The list of existing test cases looks the following way in Litmus:
>
> id # testcase summary # subgroup
> ---
> 1066 # g001 - I
Hi,
The list of existing test cases looks the following way in Litmus:
id # testcase summary # subgroup
---
1066 # g001 - Installing LibreOffice # General
1061 # g002
15 matches
Mail list logo
