On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> On 06/23/2015 12:32 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:14:54PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
>>> So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking
>>> out priority/severity_. This means that
On 06/23/2015 12:32 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:14:54PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
>> So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking
>> out priority/severity_. This means that *MAB will be retired*.
> I'd like to suggest to add this q
Hi,
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:14:54PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
> So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking
> out priority/severity_. This means that *MAB will be retired*.
I'd like to suggest to add this query as a reocurring item for the Robinson and
the rest of
Hi All!
So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking
out priority/severity_. This means that *MAB will be retired*.
What this mean:
1) If you notice that you lack privileges then just email me and I'll
add you to the list (add your bugzilla email account)[1][2]
2) *MAB
Hi All,
I stumbled on 2 bugs i confirmed quite a while back and wanted someone
to check them to see if they are MAB suitable.
https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80715
https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79422
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
On 02/06/2014 10:44 AM, bfoman wrote:
> jmadero wrote
>> Yes but we need to decide a couple things:
>> 1) is moving to a single list (or two) static lists best?
>> 2) Should we just hold off until our own bug tracker is set up because
>> then the MAB will hopefully be no longer needed as we'll just
6 bug fix releases only." :).
Best regards.
P.S.
I really hope Bugzilla will be migrated on TDF infra this year - seems no
real progress atm.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-MAB-tp4095734p4095927.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at N
On 02/06/2014 09:23 AM, bfoman wrote:
> Hi!
> Offtopic - as 4.0 is EOLed shouldn't its MAB be CLOSED FIXED soon? Probably
> most bugs to reconfirm and migrate to MAB 4.1 (or MAB even).
> It is hard to accept any MAB limit, especially when MAB 4.0 depends on 52
> open bugs, MAB 4.1 depends on 37 op
.
108 open bugs already.
Best regards.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-MAB-tp4095734p4095916.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail ad
On 02/06/2014 06:47 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 06:38:36AM -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
>> I don't think an upper limit is going to solve the problem that users are
>> quickly figuring out our secret behind the scenes action and think that it's
>> the fastest way to
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 06:38:36AM -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
> I don't think an upper limit is going to solve the problem that users are
> quickly figuring out our secret behind the scenes action and think that it's
> the fastest way to get their own bugs fixed.
There is no "secret behind the
On 02/06/2014 06:16 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:09:43AM -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
>> Can everyone be on the lookout for people putting their own bugs on MAB
>> list. I've seen an increase in users doing this and it's making the MAB
>> almost unmanageable.
> Thi
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:09:43AM -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
> Can everyone be on the lookout for people putting their own bugs on MAB
> list. I've seen an increase in users doing this and it's making the MAB
> almost unmanageable.
This might be a sideeffect of the release. But FWIW, 20 bugs
Hi All,
Can everyone be on the lookout for people putting their own bugs on MAB
list. I've seen an increase in users doing this and it's making the MAB
almost unmanageable. In the last few days I've told at least 4-5 users
to stop (in the nicest way possible but it's becoming harder and
harder). S
Tommy píše v St 31. 07. 2013 v 21:22 +0200:
> On Tue, 30
> > This is why I suggested to clean up the MAB list and do not blindly move
> > the bugs to 4.0 MAB.
>
> I agree with you. actually I'm doing critical review to get rid of some
> bugs that became WFM, bugs that do not really represent a
I agree with you. actually I'm doing critical review to get rid of
some bugs that became WFM, bugs that do not really represent a MAB
etc. etc. and move to the 4.0mab only those bugs which really deserve it.
.
I think that all this MAB per branch procedure should be reinvented
together
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:42:57 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
bfoman píše v So 27. 07. 2013 v 02:44 -0700:
Petr Mladek wrote
> About 3000 bugs were fixed for LO 4.1 [...] Only small part of them
was
> fixed via the MABs process.
Hi!
Code freeze for 4.0.x branch is set to end of October and branch
bfoman píše v So 27. 07. 2013 v 02:44 -0700:
> Petr Mladek wrote
> > About 3000 bugs were fixed for LO 4.1 [...] Only small part of them was
> > fixed via the MABs process.
>
> Hi!
> Code freeze for 4.0.x branch is set to end of October and branch will be
> EOLed in November, just in 3-4 months. M
On 07/27/2013 12:00 PM, [email protected] wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:47:29 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
(I am sorry for duplicit posting. There was a problem in the mailing
list setting and my mail had been eaten.)
Tommy píše v St 24. 07. 2013 v 20:39 +0200:
3.6.7
age in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-MAB-3-6-to-4-0-migration-When-tp4067110p4067570.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoff
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:47:29 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
(I am sorry for duplicit posting. There was a problem in the mailing
list setting and my mail had been eaten.)
Tommy píše v St 24. 07. 2013 v 20:39 +0200:
3.6.7 is out and will be the last 3.6 release.
I'm just curious to know when still
(I am sorry for duplicit posting. There was a problem in the mailing
list setting and my mail had been eaten.)
Tommy píše v St 24. 07. 2013 v 20:39 +0200:
> 3.6.7 is out and will be the last 3.6 release.
> I'm just curious to know when still living 3.6 bugs will be moved to the
> 4.0 list.
IMH
Hi,
Am 26.07.2013 12:42, schrieb Tommy:
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 20:39:24 +0200, Tommy wrote:
3.6.7 is out and will be the last 3.6 release.
I'm just curious to know when still living 3.6 bugs will be moved to
the 4.0 list.
Do you mean MAB? After EOL (End of Life [at TDF]) the list should be
c
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 20:39:24 +0200, Tommy wrote:
3.6.7 is out and will be the last 3.6 release.
I'm just curious to know when still living 3.6 bugs will be moved to the
4.0 list.
I offer my help to revise some of those bugs and move them to the new
list if they are still valid in 4.0.4.
3.6.7 is out and will be the last 3.6 release.
I'm just curious to know when still living 3.6 bugs will be moved to the
4.0 list.
I offer my help to revise some of those bugs and move them to the new list
if they are still valid in 4.0.4.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://w
Hi dE,
thanks for the list.
dE . píše v Ne 22. 04. 2012 v 10:50 +0530:
> I suggestion addition of the following bugs -
>
> Bug 32991 -- This's farely used in doc document, and may break the
> complete formatting of the document in some cases.
Yup, it is something that we really should fix.
>
I suggestion addition of the following bugs -
Bug 32991 -- This's farely used in doc document, and may break the
complete formatting of the document in some cases.
Bug 33263
Bug 48714
Bug 48713 -- Same test case as 48714
___
List Name: Libreoffice-
27 matches
Mail list logo
