Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Latest Hardware and OS

2012-12-21 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:01:01AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > iHi, > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 06:57:53AM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > > Ho hum; the Raspberry Pi version is mostly Rene's work with the Debian > > packages; I'd stick to just having the Linux + ARM architecture for that > >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Latest Hardware and OS

2012-12-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
iHi, On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 06:57:53AM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Ho hum; the Raspberry Pi version is mostly Rene's work with the Debian > packages; I'd stick to just having the Linux + ARM architecture for that > rather than a specific one (unless you really think it helps). I agree wt

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Latest Hardware and OS

2012-12-20 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Michael Meeks schrieb: that stuff is quite experimental Hi Michael, Yes, I believe the most important question is whether developers believe whether they can get benefit from reports. Bug reports would be rather useless if rally anything is completely experimental and developers still are

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Latest Hardware and OS

2012-12-20 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Rainer, On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 07:48 +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > we have LibO also running on Android OS and Raspberry Pi hardware. What > do you think, should we have these environments explicitly in Bugzilla? Ho hum; the Raspberry Pi version is mostly Rene's work with the Debian

[Libreoffice-qa] Latest Hardware and OS

2012-12-20 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Hi all, we have LibO also running on Android OS and Raspberry Pi hardware. What do you think, should we have these environments explicitly in Bugzilla? Discussion please on ! Best regards Rainer Bielefeld (QA Volunteer) ___ List Name: Libreoffice-