Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Food for thought...

2013-06-15 Thread mariosv
Hi Pedro, I think it is not needed any special justification in this case, even I don't like some linked people. Really I do not understand the concerns. Food for thought usually is good. IMMHO there are concerns that should be, as it is so few work to look for in the QA email. Or how the main j

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Food for thought...

2013-06-14 Thread Pedro
Hi Bjoern Bjoern Michaelsen wrote > great to see your enthusiasm here, but while that is indeed an interesting > read, can we please keep the QA list on QA topics? Actually I think these ARE QA topics (although they are not QA *work*). The first article talks about User Satisfaction which is a c

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Food for thought...

2013-06-14 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Pedro, On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 02:12:48AM -0700, Pedro wrote: > Another interesting reading > http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2013/06/13/wasted-time/ > This time about the new sidebar (and more, obviously) great to see your enthusiasm here, but while that is indeed an interesting read

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Food for thought...

2013-06-14 Thread Pedro
Another interesting reading http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2013/06/13/wasted-time/ This time about the new sidebar (and more, obviously) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Food-for-thought-tp4061338p4061428.html Sent from the QA mailing list archiv

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Food for thought...

2013-06-13 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 04:11:57PM -0700, Pedro wrote: > I'm well aware of Rob's bias. However assuming the bias is in the analysis > and not in the values, there are some interesting results. Thats a bold assumption -- I wouldnt go that far. If those numbers would be really relevant, we shou

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Food for thought...

2013-06-13 Thread Pedro
V Stuart Foote wrote > Not sure I'd exactly consider Rob's musings as unbiased. I'm well aware of Rob's bias. However assuming the bias is in the analysis and not in the values, there are some interesting results. V Stuart Foote wrote > In that time frame LibreOffice has issued I think 15 time

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Food for thought...

2013-06-13 Thread V Stuart Foote
Not sure I'd exactly consider Rob's musings as unbiased. Kind of an apples and oranges comparison, truth be told the public persona of Apache Open Office is still based on a 12 month old release (r1351645). Relatively bug free, but remains feature poor compared to the AOO development builds.

[Libreoffice-qa] Food for thought...

2013-06-13 Thread Pedro
Hi all QAers A very interesting reading http://www.robweir.com/blog/2013/06/the-power-of-brand-and-the-power-of-product-part-2.html Kind regards, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Food-for-thought-tp4061338.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive