Re: [Libreoffice-qa] FAQ for qa.libreoffice.org

2013-04-23 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Bjoern Michaelsen schrieb: Hmmm, I kinda feel its not good to put that on a website with restricted access Hi, +1 I think we should distinguish 2 different (but overlapping, of course) areas. a) What we here are talking about every day! What bugs are blockers, how to use Qa-Contact-field

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] FAQ for qa.libreoffice.org

2013-04-23 Thread Pedro
Hi Florian I think it is better FAQ for QA More questions * Can I have several versions of LibreOffice in parallel? *Is there an easy way to filter bugs (e.g. by OS and/or application and/or status)? -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-FAQ-for

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] FAQ for qa.libreoffice.org

2013-04-23 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 04:26:34PM +0200, Florian Reisinger wrote: > As I am the coordinator for the qa.libreoffice.org launch, I would > like to make a QA for QA section (Questions and answers for quality > assurance. The page-name is different, of course). So, if you have a > question, which you

[Libreoffice-qa] FAQ for qa.libreoffice.org

2013-04-23 Thread Florian Reisinger
Hi :) As I am the coordinator for the qa.libreoffice.org launch, I would like to make a QA for QA section (Questions and answers for quality assurance. The page-name is different, of course). So, if you have a question, which you thing would be appropriate for "QA for QA", please add it to yo