Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Triage Process Update

2011-11-09 Thread Petr Mladek
Cor Nouws píše v Út 08. 11. 2011 v 21:25 +0100: > Rainer Bielefeld wrote (08-11-11 20:17) > > Of course it's also interesting to see the latest activities, but of > > course all bugs without review deserve attention > > When the idea is to make it extra attractive for people to look at bugs, > it

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Triage Process Update

2011-11-09 Thread Petr Mladek
Rainer Bielefeld píše v Út 08. 11. 2011 v 20:17 +0100: > > It looked like the step 3 from the Bug Triage process. > > More or less. But explications on that page and others are too > "businesslike". We should show interested new users that it's really > simple and no special skills (except some

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Triage Process Update

2011-11-08 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Petr, Rainer, Rainer Bielefeld wrote (08-11-11 20:17) 3. Query last two days: Of course it's also interesting to see the latest activities, but of course all bugs without review deserve attention When the idea is to make it extra attractive for people to look at bugs, it might be that me

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Triage Process Update

2011-11-08 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Hi Petr, thank you for starting this cleanup. I am just preparing some other activities, but unfortunately I currently have not much time. I think that the page is slightly outdated. Yes, it is! It looked like the step 3 from the Bug Triage process. More or less. But explications on t

[Libreoffice-qa] Bug Triage Process Update

2011-11-08 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi Rainer, others, I propose few changes to http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugTriage, see below. I think that the page is slightly outdated. Also I suggest few changes in the workflow. You are the experts, I would like to know your opinion :-) 1. Duplicated steps on the main QA wiki page: --