Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-design] Saying Goodbye

Hi Jay, If your job is connected with your activity in community and you gained the advantage from this activity to the job, could you write an article about this advantage? I think it would be useful to attract new young contributors. Regards, Lera 2018-02-14 22:52 GMT+03:00 Jay Philips

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New wiki page: QA Stats

0&diff=138070&oldid=138054 You change the category form [[Category:QA/Stats]] to [[Category:QA / Stats]]. Best regards, Lera ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: https://li

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New wiki page: QA Stats

Hi Xisco, Why do you use the QA / Stats as category instead the QA/Stats? Best regards, Lera ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo

[Libreoffice-qa] Building Win-x86@62-merge-TDF and Win-x86_64@62-TDF

//dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@62-merge-TDF/ http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86_64@62-TDF/ Will these building be mad? the best regards, Lera ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Building or bibisecting

Hi Sophie, В письме от 1 декабря 2015 15:56:35 пользователь Sophie написал: > I would like to know who here is frequently building LibreOffice or is > bibisecting on a regular basis? I build LO about one or two times a week. But I do not bibisect. Best regards

[Libreoffice-qa] there is no id_key and lexical item

://forumooo.ru/index.php/topic,4654.msg28722.html#msg28722 Thanks in advance. CC to Serg Bormant and kompilainenn. Best regards, Lera ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http

[Libreoffice-qa] Question about [Bug 86401] Error after close LibreOffice

Hi, Could anybody look at this bug and provide feedback, please? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86401 I think that it is bug not in the LibreOffice code. But I may mistake. What information should be collected for its specification? Thank you in advance. Lera

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] question about a bug confirmation

Thank you a lot, Stuart and Joel. Maybe I really should have set the severity as 'enhancement'. Anyway, now I better understand how to explain such situation to Russian- speaking users. Best regards, Lera В письме от 23 ноября 2014 09:44:34 пользователь Joel Madero написал: > On 11/

[Libreoffice-qa] question about a bug confirmation

status NEW only when developers confirm than bug can be fixed? Do mathematical rules no longer apply to LibreOffice? What should I tell users? Thanks in advance for the clarification. Best regards, Lera ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail

[Libreoffice-qa] test cases in MozTrap

Hi, MozTrap has test cases for 4.4.0 Alpha 2, but we already have the beta 1 build. Could anyone do the test cases for beta1, please? Thank you Lera ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change

[Libreoffice-qa] the Win-x86@51-TDF build

Hello, Can you add the Russian language in the Win-x86@51-TDF build, please? Some Russian people don't know English, but try to check the functionality which they use every day for this build. They asked me to make this request. Is it possible? Thank you in advance.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] difference between builds

Hi Christian. Thank you. Now it is clear. Lera. В письме от 7 ноября 2014 14:40:57 пользователь Christian Lohmaier написал: > That's the identifier of the tinderbox/buildbot that created the build. > > See > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Tinderbox#

[Libreoffice-qa] difference between builds

Hi, Could anybody explain the difference between builds on the page, please? http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/ I understand what is “Linux”, “Window”, “MacOs”, x86, 86_64, rpm, deb. But don't understand the piece after @ (at). Thank you in advance.