-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Christian,
>
> For the upcoming version 5.0.4 the builds for RC1 are now available
> on pre-releases.
>
> It is a build in release-configuration, meaning that it will update
> a previous version of LibreOffice on Windows. Linux and Mac users
> can
>
> I will gladly work on such a proposal. However the bugzilla modifications
> were not my idea, they were from Tommy. I just said I agreed that there are
> too many versions. In any case I don't see how my opinion can affect the
> current policies. I'm just a user, I'm not even a QA member.
Don
jmadero wrote
>> LibreOffice/TDF absolutely needs a user friendly Bug Submission Assistant
>> where users can report bugs they found in the stable releases of the live
>> branches (currently 4.4, 5.0 and 5.1). This would reduce the list to less
>> than 15 options...
> So . . . I think this is a com
On 12/01/2015 03:19 PM, Pedro wrote:
> jmadero wrote
>> On 12/01/2015 09:03 AM, Sophie wrote:
>>> What he was trying to find imho is a compromise between what is needed
>>> for QA and for users. Of course, the more granularity the better, but I
>>> think also that a long list of version is confus
I quite often do bibisect, most often from the daily dbgutil repository for
Linux, but going to older versions as needed. I have, just for the fun of
it, cloned the Windows bibisect repository, and it seems to be good; however
it covers such a narrow range of commits that I seldom think of using i
jmadero wrote
> On 12/01/2015 09:03 AM, Sophie wrote:
>> What he was trying to find imho is a compromise between what is needed
>> for QA and for users. Of course, the more granularity the better, but I
>> think also that a long list of version is confusing.
I think the problem here is that a comp
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Sophie wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a QA meeting planed tomorrow and at what time will it be?
Hi Sophie,
Yes, there'll be a QA Meeting tomorrow. Agenda/Pending Action Items here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2015/December_02
Handy-dandy meetin
On 12/01/2015 10:16 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>
> 5.0.0.3 and 5.0.0.4 beta2: 42
> between rc3 and rc4
>
> As long as the merge-to-one-version indicates what version was set
> prior to the unification, I don't see the information loss, but it
> should be a standardized comment, so that you co
Hi Joel,
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
>
>
> On 12/01/2015 02:59 AM, Pedro wrote:
>> Hi Joel
>>
>>
>> jmadero wrote
If a user is able to tell that a bug was introduced between 4.0.0 and
4.0.1,
a bibisect in that range should be able to find the problematic
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 5.1.0, the builds for beta1 are now
available on pre-releases.
5.1.0 is scheduled to be released beginning of February
While the build is made available in all supported languages and
translation templates were updated, translations may still be incomplete.
Se
Hello all,
For the upcoming version 5.0.4 the builds for RC1 are now available on
pre-releases.
It is a build in release-configuration, meaning that it will update a
previous version of LibreOffice on Windows.
Linux and Mac users can install alongside LibreOffice 4.4
For the complete schedule.,
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 4.4.7 the builds for RC2 are now
available on pre-releases.
It is a build in release-configuration, meaning that it will update a
previous version of LibreOffice on Windows.
Linux and Mac users can install alongside LibreOffice 5.0
See
https://wiki.documentfou
Hi all,
Is there a QA meeting planed tomorrow and at what time will it be?
Thanks!
Cheers
Sophie
--
Sophie Gautier [email protected]
GSM: +33683901545
IRC: sophi
Co-founder - Release coordinator
The Document Foundation
___
List Name:
On 12/01/2015 09:03 AM, Sophie wrote:
> Hi Joel,
> Le 01/12/2015 17:53, Joel Madero a écrit :
>>
>>
> Tommy's proposal was to simplify BZ approach on a user point of view. It
> is intimidating to go further when you're not sure what version you are
> using, and RC, beta are not clear things for u
Hi Joel,
Le 01/12/2015 17:53, Joel Madero a écrit :
>
>
> On 12/01/2015 02:59 AM, Pedro wrote:
>> No, I never tried bibisect on Windows. But Sophie volunteered to give me a
>> hand if I decided to try so I assume it is possible.
>>
>> Again, what would be the advantage to have the user install 4.
On 12/01/2015 08:52 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> I don't bibisect - one of the reasons being that last time I tried,
> bibisecting on OSX required one to go through the pain of Gatekeeper
> every *** time you start LO
(08:57:21 AM) shm_get_: *jmadero 1/ you can turn off gatekeeper while
y
Le 01/12/2015 15:56, Sophie a écrit :
Hi Sophie,
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to know who here is frequently building LibreOffice or is
> bibisecting on a regular basis?
> You can either answer on the list or directly to me if you prefer.
> Thanks a lot in advance for your feedback
I try and bui
On 12/01/2015 02:59 AM, Pedro wrote:
> No, I never tried bibisect on Windows. But Sophie volunteered to give me a
> hand if I decided to try so I assume it is possible.
>
> Again, what would be the advantage to have the user install 4.0.0 Beta1,
> Beta2, RC1, etc? Reducing the search range to a 0
On 12/01/2015 02:59 AM, Pedro wrote:
> Hi Joel
>
>
> jmadero wrote
>>> If a user is able to tell that a bug was introduced between 4.0.0 and
>>> 4.0.1,
>>> a bibisect in that range should be able to find the problematic
>>> commit/patch?
>>> What would be the advantage to have the user install 4.
Sophi, *
Build on Linux but only when patching.
Routinely bisect against my archive of daily pulls of Windows TBs.
I don't run a bibisect git repo (though I probably should invest in setting
up the Windows flavor since we seem short there).
Stuart
--
View this message in context:
http://nab
Hi Sophie,
В письме от 1 декабря 2015 15:56:35 пользователь Sophie написал:
> I would like to know who here is frequently building LibreOffice or is
> bibisecting on a regular basis?
I build LO about one or two times a week. But I do not bibisect.
Best regards,
Lera
_
Hi all,
I would like to know who here is frequently building LibreOffice or is
bibisecting on a regular basis?
You can either answer on the list or directly to me if you prefer.
Thanks a lot in advance for your feedback
Cheers
Sophie
--
Sophie Gautier [email protected]
GSM: +3
Hi Joel
jmadero wrote
>> If a user is able to tell that a bug was introduced between 4.0.0 and
>> 4.0.1,
>> a bibisect in that range should be able to find the problematic
>> commit/patch?
>> What would be the advantage to have the user install 4.0.0 Beta1, Beta2,
>> RC1, etc?
>
> Bibisect is re
23 matches
Mail list logo
