Re: [Libreoffice-qa] organizing our "crasher" bugs ?

Le 29/05/2015 04:07, Joel Madero a écrit : Hi Joel, > What I think would be minimum (and can be done) is: > Confirm each crash on 5.0; > _Ensure_ that each has easy steps; > > For the most straight forward ones that have easy steps we can just mark > them as critical + highest - signaling that

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > there is no excuse to not run 'make check' anymore at least before > pushing -- if there ever was one. you mean beside the fact that make check fails on Windows _and_ Mac ? ___ List Name: Libre

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] organizing our "crasher" bugs ?

On 05/27/2015 07:25 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > There are ~190 bugs with the word "crash" in the summary in the states > new/assigned/reopened/unconfirmed. > > As with the coverity, import-testing, export-testing stuff I think it > would be helpful to start chewing into crashers in some systemat

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi, On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:40:40PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > And with this I see a lot of processes running parallel till the end. This > suggests to me that the stuff is quite parallelized -- however none of the > testing threads seem to be CPU-bound rather the Java-stuff seems to be

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi, On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 06:01:33PM +, Noel Grandin wrote: > Wasn't someone going to look at speeding that up? Make check is not > currently making very good use of multiple cores and it has a long tail > where only one or two cores are busy. I cant fully confirm that -- at least not combi

[Libreoffice-qa] Linux dbgutil bibisect repo.

Hi all, I am back on the internet again, and I am trying to do some QA work. Toward that end, a couple of questions: (1) The Linux dbgutil bibisect repository is not giving symbolic information to gdb. See for example the skimpy backtrace in

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: > + Windows 64 status (David O) >+ all fine, poking some Base test with Stephan >+ an OLE test, failing on some machines not others; > environment dependent. Thorsten's machine doesn't crash. That

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

> > * Jenkins update (Norbert) I missed the call.. but here are the stats for last week: from:Thu May 21 16:11:49 2015 master linux rel jobs:155 ok:147 ko:7 fail ratio:4.51% break:2 broken duration:1.83% master linux dbg jobs:105 ok:97 ko:8 fail ratio:7.61% break:3 broken duration:5.44% master ma

[Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

* Present: + Andras, Caolan, Kendy, Sophie, Michael M, David T, Bjoern, David O, Robinson, Miklos, Muthu, Thorsten, Lionel * Completed Action Items: + add ooenv bits for cppunittests (Michael) + take pretty Cambridge Hackfest pictures (Thorsten) [ pending permission from

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug/feature on Bugzilla?

Hi Stuart, all That was also my conclusion that someone had added me :) Meanwhile I received an email from user Beluga with the instructions on how to add myself automatically to any bug I comment (I'm copying the instructions here since they might be useful to other people in QA, or just anyone

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.4.4 rc1 test builds available

Hi *, for the upcoming new version 4.4.4 the builds for RC1 are now available on pre-releases. It is a build in release-configuration, meaning that it will update a previous version of LibreOffice on Windows. Linux and Mac users can install alongside LibreOffice 4.3 See https://wiki.documentfou