Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Unable to set ux-advise bugs to NEW in new bugzilla

2015-01-31 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Joel Madero wrote: > So - just my two cents here. I'm not a big fan of changing our workflow > - ours works, mostly everyone is happy, devs seem to get it, QA gets it, > documentation explains it, etc... etc... it's kind of like "why reinvent > what already works."

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] And then there were two...

2015-01-31 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:21 PM, David Tardon wrote: >> > - libabw >> > - libcdr >> > - libetonyek >> > - libfreehand >> > - libmspub >> > - libpagemaker >> > - libvisio >> >> The libraries are all versioned separately, right? I'm thinking: one >> product for each library, and a general 'DLP' pro

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Unable to set ux-advise bugs to NEW in new bugzilla

2015-01-31 Thread Joel Madero
On 01/31/2015 10:33 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote: > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Jay Philips wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> As ux-advise bugs are not supposed to be affecting the QA bug count, the >> new bugzilla doesnt permit me to change its status when creating a bug >> report. > Hi Jay, > > I did so

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Unable to set ux-advise bugs to NEW in new bugzilla

2015-01-31 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Jay Philips wrote: > Hi All, > > As ux-advise bugs are not supposed to be affecting the QA bug count, the > new bugzilla doesnt permit me to change its status when creating a bug > report. Hi Jay, I did some tweaking of the config in Bugzilla 4.4.6 to make sure t

[Libreoffice-qa] Unable to set ux-advise bugs to NEW in new bugzilla

2015-01-31 Thread Jay Philips
Hi All, As ux-advise bugs are not supposed to be affecting the QA bug count, the new bugzilla doesnt permit me to change its status when creating a bug report. -- Regards, Jay Philips ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-31 Thread bfoman
jmadero wrote > I also suggest that people join the bugzilla mailing list. People over > there are quite helpful and it would be good to start probing them to > see how to begin to implement these changes :) Hi! For all who want to start hacking TDF Bugzilla here is a list of useful links: - https

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-31 Thread Joel Madero
On 01/31/2015 06:12 AM, bfoman wrote: > jmadero wrote >> and try to figure out how that >> page is generated. I triedcouldn't find it for the life of me :-/ > Hi! > It is quite easy - it is implemented as Extension. The page template is > extensions/WeeklyBugSummary/template/en/default/pages/w

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-31 Thread Joel Madero
Top posting just to say thanks! Best, Joel On 01/31/2015 04:28 AM, Robinson Tryon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen > wrote: >> Nope. Bugzilla is Infra. Infra is on Redmine. > Here are the Bugzilla bugs on redmine: > https://redmine.documentfoundation.org/projects/infra

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-31 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 3:12 PM, bfoman wrote: > BTW: I would like to see Bugzilla custom changes announcements (with > rationale when needed) somewhere else than only in git repo at > https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=bugzilla.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/tdf-4.4.6. Yep, sounds good to me!

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] that walrus

2015-01-31 Thread bfoman
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote > He/She might reappear possibly though now that this > is "our" Bugzilla: e.g. for bug hunting sessions. Those have hunter walrus (https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/4/44/Bughuntban4.4.png). -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-31 Thread bfoman
jmadero wrote > and try to figure out how that > page is generated. I triedcouldn't find it for the life of me :-/ Hi! It is quite easy - it is implemented as Extension. The page template is extensions/WeeklyBugSummary/template/en/default/pages/weekly-bug-summary.html.tmpl. The code with SQL q

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-31 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Nope. Bugzilla is Infra. Infra is on Redmine. Here are the Bugzilla bugs on redmine: https://redmine.documentfoundation.org/projects/infrastructure/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&set_filter=1&f%5B%5D=status_id&op%5Bstatus_id%5D=o&f%5B%5D=category

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-31 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 04:14:24PM -0800, Joel Madero wrote: >> I've never been a fan of this split to begin with. Having a much less >> visible means of suggesting enhancement requests or bugs pretty much >> just sucks. Just speaking for

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] suggestion for weekly-bug-summary

2015-01-31 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Joel Madero wrote: >>> I agree that it would be good & it is possible. >> Can I change add a query myself to that page? > So you can clone our instance of bugzilla: git clone > git://gerrit.libreoffice.org/bugzilla and try to figure out how that > page is generated