Re: [Libreoffice-qa] NEW Bug Mass Ping Round 2

Hey All, > On 06.01.2015 23:58, Joel Madero wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> So I suppose we'll start chunking into the next set relatively quickly. >> I was thinking at the end of January doing anything 22 months or more, >> slowly decrease this to 12 months. I don't want to hit all of these at >> once as

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] NEW Bug Mass Ping Round 2

On 06.01.2015 23:58, Joel Madero wrote: > Hi All, > > So I suppose we'll start chunking into the next set relatively quickly. > I was thinking at the end of January doing anything 22 months or more, > slowly decrease this to 12 months. I don't want to hit all of these at > once as there are alread

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] installation of daily build for Win

On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 08:14 -0700, V Stuart Foote wrote: > Hi Terry, > > I get a clean /A administrative install of the build. > > > > > Here are HASHs for a clean download. > > MD5 d4fd4717662800ed9ddf26

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] installation of daily build for Win

Hi Terry, I get a clean /A administrative install of the build. Here are HASHs for a clean download. MD5 d4fd4717662800ed9ddf2613e2ca82f2 SHA-256 18903d3b926f9fc328b15c6d7e0d7e2346149ddd5172f88630e655aa

[Libreoffice-qa] installation of daily build for Win

Hello, all. I have downloaded , and I am trying to install it on Windows Vista SP1. The installation command (all one line) (I am retyping this): msiexec /a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] NEW Bug Mass Ping Round 2

On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 23:58:27 +0100, Joel Madero wrote: Hi All, So I suppose we'll start chunking into the next set relatively quickly. I was thinking at the end of January doing anything 22 months or more, slowly decrease this to 12 months. I don't want to hit all of these at once as there a