Hi Joel,
On Thursday, 2014-11-06 15:01:40 -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
> Good news is - now REOPENED actually has a useful definition:
> "A bug is REOPENED if it is (1) assigned; (2) the assigned developer
> said they fixed it; (3) someone has reproduced the problem on a version
> which according to
Hi!
Robinson Tryon wrote
> The goal of this test install is for us to verify that it can operate
> in the same fashion as Bugzilla running on FDO. Because email is used
> so heavily in the bug tracker, I think it would be a huge burden to
> try to test if we shunted the bugmail to a file. Do you h
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:23 AM, bfoman wrote:
> Robinson Tryon wrote
>> Yes, passwords should be invalidated.
>
> Could you please confirm it? I couldn't check it by myself.
The database dump I received has the passwords cleared.
> Robinson Tryon wrote
>> Bugmail is currently enabled for regular
Hi *,
Am 07.11.2014 um 00:01 schrieb Joel Madero:
1. What should we do about bugs that are REOPENED but unassigned? IMHO
these should be pushed back to NEW
+1
2. Should we ping developers who have reopened bugs to see if they are
going to look into it again or if they can drop the bug?
+1
Hi!
Robinson Tryon wrote
> Yes, passwords should be invalidated.
Could you please confirm it? I couldn't check it by myself.
Robinson Tryon wrote
> Bugmail is currently enabled for regular user accounts.
> I've added a warning message asking
> people to try to avoid heavily-spamming people who
Hello,
Can you add the Russian language in the Win-x86@51-TDF build, please? Some
Russian people don't know English, but try to check the functionality which
they use every day for this build. They asked me to make this request. Is it
possible?
Thank you in advance.
Lera.
_
Hi Christian.
Thank you. Now it is clear.
Lera.
В письме от 7 ноября 2014 14:40:57 пользователь Christian Lohmaier написал:
> That's the identifier of the tinderbox/buildbot that created the build.
>
> See
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Tinderbox#List_of_registere
> d_Tinderb
Hi Lera,
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Lera Goncharuk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could anybody explain the difference between builds on the page, please?
> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/
> I understand what is “Linux”, “Window”, “MacOs”, x86, 86_64, rpm, deb. But
> don't understand the p
Hi,
Could anybody explain the difference between builds on the page, please?
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/
I understand what is “Linux”, “Window”, “MacOs”, x86, 86_64, rpm, deb. But
don't understand the piece after @ (at).
Thank you in advance.
Lera.
__
