Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2014-11-02 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 20:00 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: >+ I think that the best would be to have this option locale to the > sorting dialog instead of global for Calc > Is it something possible? Not unless someone volunteers. FYI it would require a fair amount of code change

[Libreoffice-qa] Building a Libreoffice package for Debian from source

2014-11-02 Thread Enrique Javier Rueda Martín
Hello. I had built a Libreoffice package for Debian from source code. Here are the links. Sorry, it is in spanish because my english is very poor. I hope it will be useful. Thank you for Libreoffice. http://alnus.esdebian.org/50334/metodo-personal-obtencion-paquetes-debian-libreoffice-partir-c

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2014-11-02 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 20:13 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > Le 30/10/2014 20:05, Kohei Yoshida a écrit : > > On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 20:00 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > >>+ I think that the best would be to have this option locale to the > >> sorting dialog instead of global for Ca

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2014-11-02 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Michael Meeks wrote: > + apparently a fiction that as of today there is idle TDF owned hardware. > No idea why this is relevant here, but for the record: there is a number of donated / sponsored boxes with TDF, that for various hysterical reasons are not under infra control. 3-4 of them are mos

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New bugzilla instance: Version information

2014-11-02 Thread Joel Madero
Yes it has been discussed and generally agreed upon - but migration has to happen first. Best, Joel On 11/02/2014 02:16 AM, Nino Novak wrote: > Hi, > > browsing through Thommy's UNCO bug list I felt the wish to know which was the > - First (oldest) known version containing the bug > - Last (youn

[Libreoffice-qa] New bugzilla instance: Version information

2014-11-02 Thread Nino Novak
Hi, browsing through Thommy's UNCO bug list I felt the wish to know which was the - First (oldest) known version containing the bug - Last (youngest) version tested still containing the bug. So my question is: is it possible - does it make sense - or is it already planned to have these two versio