Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.0 RC1 test builds available

2013-12-18 Thread bfoman
Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote > Also new: Starting with 4.2.0rc1, developers (and people doing some > "low-level" QA) on windows can make use of the symbol server to get > pdb files for debugging the release builds. Hi! This is a great news and IMHO big milestone for this project. Hope delivering sym

[Libreoffice-qa] Symbol server for Windows bug reporting

2013-12-18 Thread bjoern
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 08:17:56PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 21:13 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > Also new: Starting with 4.2.0rc1, developers (and people doing some > > "low-level" QA) on windows can make use of the symbol server to get > > pdb files for debuggin

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libo-marketing-priv] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.0 RC1 test builds available

2013-12-18 Thread Michael Meeks
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 21:13 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Also new: Starting with 4.2.0rc1, developers (and people doing some > "low-level" QA) on windows can make use of the symbol server to get > pdb files for debugging the release builds. The symbol server's URL is > > http://dev-download

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.0 RC1 test builds available

2013-12-18 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, for the upcoming new version 4.2.0, the builds for rc1 are now available on pre-releases. Besides the usual builds, there are also 64bit builds for Mac available for testing. Also new: Starting with 4.2.0rc1, developers (and people doing some "low-level" QA) on windows can make use of the s

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LO 4.2 RC1 (aka 4.2.0.1)

2013-12-18 Thread Pedro
Hi Andras Andras Timar-3 wrote > Explanation in short: this optionality made little sense I agree. Thank you for the quick answer. It saves me the trouble of reporting a bug just to find out that it's a feature :) Cheers, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundat

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LO 4.2 RC1 (aka 4.2.0.1)

2013-12-18 Thread Andras Timar
Hi, On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Pedro wrote: > Hi all > > As I have mentioned several times during Alpha development (and never got > any answer, as usual) the 4.2 installer under Windows no longer offers the > option to select which Modules to install during a Custom install. > > Was this a

[Libreoffice-qa] LO 4.2 RC1 (aka 4.2.0.1)

2013-12-18 Thread Pedro
Hi all As I have mentioned several times during Alpha development (and never got any answer, as usual) the 4.2 installer under Windows no longer offers the option to select which Modules to install during a Custom install. Was this a TDF decision or is this a bug? (Before someone feels the urge

[Libreoffice-qa] Accessibility update?

2013-12-18 Thread Robinson Tryon
Hi Stuart (and other a11y QAers*), We missed you on the QA call this week! Couple of questions: * Any update on the Start Center and Sidebar in 4.2 ? I tried using the 4.2 beta 2 with just a keyboard, and it's not the easiest thing to navigate. I'm working on using Orca, and it's rather tough!

[Libreoffice-qa] QA Meeting Minutes - 2013-12-16

2013-12-18 Thread Robinson Tryon
Hi all, Meeting minutes are available here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/December_16 Our next meeting will be in two weeks: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/December_30 As always, our meetings are open to everyone -- please feel free to join us for the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345

2013-12-18 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Robinson Tryon wrote: > lo (6) > lobz (7) > > Separated by just a single vote, lo and lobz are (unsurprisingly) the > favorites :-) Hi all, In the voting rules I said "If there's no clear winner, we can have a run-off." A number of people have decried the process

[Libreoffice-qa] Moztrap: relation between version/runs/cases

2013-12-18 Thread Sophie
Hi Yi Fan, all I need some help to understand the relation between test cases, run, versions. - when I create a new Version (LibreOffice 4.2.0), I indicate that test cases are based on LibreOffice 0 - then I've created 4.2.0 beta2 and 4.2.0RC1 runs always based on LibreOffice 0 test cases The pro

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345

2013-12-18 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Joren DC wrote: > Robinson Tryon schreef op 17/12/13 13:41: >> lo (6) >> lobz (7) >> >> Separated by just a single vote, lo and lobz are (unsurprisingly) the >> favorites :-) > What about lbz, which is a combination of our 2 top-votes (lo and lobz)? > lbz was also

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] tag for new features

2013-12-18 Thread Sophie
Hi Robinson, Le 18/12/2013 09:36, Robinson Tryon a écrit : > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Sophie wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to propose to developers that they open an issue for each >> new features or changes that need help file appended to it. In order to >> ease the search in BZ (

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] tag for new features

2013-12-18 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Sophie wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to propose to developers that they open an issue for each > new features or changes that need help file appended to it. In order to > ease the search in BZ (the aim is to have documenters search for it and > fix them), what

[Libreoffice-qa] tag for new features

2013-12-18 Thread Sophie
Hi all, I would like to propose to developers that they open an issue for each new features or changes that need help file appended to it. In order to ease the search in BZ (the aim is to have documenters search for it and fix them), what would be the best flag to add to whiteboard status? Is NF f