On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 01:54:31PM -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> As the 4.0+ repo is currently out of commission, is anyone stashing
> daily builds at this point? I'd like to avoid a gap in our bibisect
> repo coverage, if possible.
I never 'stashed' build. Once enough has happened on master, wou
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:44 PM, bjoern wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:58:26AM -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote:
>> Bjoern - Can we/should we include builds from the 4.0+ repo?
>
> No, as they are redundant to builds in the 2013-10-12 repo.
Roger.
>> Are you still stashing daily builds in a repo
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:58:26AM -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> Bjoern - Can we/should we include builds from the 4.0+ repo?
No, as they are redundant to builds in the 2013-10-12 repo.
> Are you still stashing daily builds in a repo?
I am not and never did daily builds.
Best,
Bjoern
___
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Pedro wrote:
> Hi qubit
>
> In this server you have ALL builds for ALL OSes since 3.3.0 Beta1 until
> 4.0.5 and 4.1.0 (i.e until August 15th 2013)
> ftp://ftp.uni-muenster.de/pub/software/LibreOffice/testing/
>
> Are these useful?
Hi Pedro,
Any builds that are (e
Hi qubit
In this server you have ALL builds for ALL OSes since 3.3.0 Beta1 until
4.0.5 and 4.1.0 (i.e until August 15th 2013)
ftp://ftp.uni-muenster.de/pub/software/LibreOffice/testing/
Are these useful?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libr
Hi folks,
Here's my current plan for merging all of our bibisect repos into one:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bibisect/Bibisectzilla
Are there any other master builds in the 3.3 - 3.5 era that we can include?
Bjoern - Can we/should we include builds from the 4.0+ repo? Are you
still st
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:20:20 +0100, Thomas Hackert
wrote:
regarding "Abbreviation"
We need an abbreviation for the new bug tracker that we can use
instead of "FDO".
Suggestions:
lo ("LO") - e.g. "lo#12345" (The lower-case "L" is ambiguous...)
libo
bz - e.g. "bz#12345"
bgz
I vote for "li
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Christian Lohmaier
wrote:
>
> Just a reminder that URLs in areas that cannot be changed at our will (those
> in the LibreOffice software for example - you cannot change URLs on software
> that the end user has installed) should preferably use hub.LibreOffice.org
>
Hi *,
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Christian Lohmaier
wrote:
>
>>
>> bugs.libreoffice.org over to bugs.freedesktop.org*.
Setup now - depending on how your DNS is configured you might need to
wait a little, but if you don't have cached misses or similar, it
should work immediately.
ciao
Chr
Hi *,
Am 10.11.2013 08:09 schrieb "Robinson Tryon" :
>
> bugs.libreoffice.org over to bugs.freedesktop.org*. Setting up a
> redirect would not change anything present in Silverstripe, the Wiki,
> etc.., but it would allow us to manually update links in Silverstripe,
> the Wiki, and elsewhere and t
Hello Nino, *,
On Sonntag, 10. November 2013 10:35 Nino Novak wrote:
> Am 10.11.2013 07:24, schrieb Tommy:
>> On Sat, 09 Nov 2013 07:28:36 +0100, Robinson Tryon
>> wrote:
>>> As mentioned at the QA Meeting, I've provided a first draft of
>>> the proposal to migrate from FDO to our own install of B
Am 10.11.2013 07:24, schrieb Tommy:
> On Sat, 09 Nov 2013 07:28:36 +0100, Robinson Tryon
> wrote:
>
>> Hiya,
>>
>> As mentioned at the QA Meeting, I've provided a first draft of the
>> proposal to migrate from FDO to our own install of Bugzilla:
>> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/
12 matches
Mail list logo
