Hi Pedro, Sophie
Am 11.05.2013 23:48, schrieb Pedro:
Hi again Sophie
sophi wrote
The QA list is out of our domain, it's on freedsktop.org, so I doubt we
can do anything here, the messages are not posted from Nabble. Even to
moderate these mails on the queue so they don't appear at all.
Flori
Hi Stuat,
Am 12.05.2013 00:16, schrieb V Stuart Foote:
[...]
Hmm, I think the QA list IS hosted the same as the other TDF mail
lists, with freedesktop.org DNS registration.
I really think not, becuase I have to log in @freedesktop to do
moderation (yes I do moderation, but I do not have ac
Hi Samuel,
Submitted a crash bug in Win7x64:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64482
Miguel Ángel.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Test-the-Photo-Album-Creator-tp4055367p4055433.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabbl
Hi All,
Can someone take a look at this one and try to confirm it - it is our
oldest standing unconfirmed bug and should be dealt with IMO. Either
push it forward or close it (probably needs a dev to comment).
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35041&list_id=299863
Reporter is Rai
Pedro,
>From: [email protected] on behalf of Pedro
>[[email protected]]
>Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 4:48 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Cleaning up QA Nabble and Archive folders from
> Spam?
>
>Hi again Sophie
>
>
>sophi
Hi again Sophie
sophi wrote
> The QA list is out of our domain, it's on freedsktop.org, so I doubt we
> can do anything here, the messages are not posted from Nabble. Even to
> moderate these mails on the queue so they don't appear at all.
>>
>> Florian Effenberger is the right person to help yo
Hi Pedro,
On 11/05/2013 19:24, Pedro wrote:
> Hi Sophie
>
>
> sophi wrote
>> Drew is currently not available and I'm taking care of Nabble. I think
>> the spam you see here is the one getting on the list. I can remove all
>> the spam mails on Nabble, but they'll still be on the archive, see:
>> h
Hi Sophie
sophi wrote
> Drew is currently not available and I'm taking care of Nabble. I think
> the spam you see here is the one getting on the list. I can remove all
> the spam mails on Nabble, but they'll still be on the archive, see:
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/2013
Hi Pedro,
I've added Florian in CC to get his opinion too.
On 11/05/2013 18:30, Pedro wrote:
> Hi Drew
>
>
> drewjensen wrote
>> Ok - deleted what was indeed a bunch of spam at the nabble archive -
>> added a few emails addy's to the kill list.. looks like only one email
>> made it to the main ar
Hi Drew
drewjensen wrote
> Ok - deleted what was indeed a bunch of spam at the nabble archive -
> added a few emails addy's to the kill list.. looks like only one email
> made it to the main archive.
I'm not getting any SPAM because I subscribe in no-mail mode.
However the Nabble page looks a
On 05/11/2013 07:11 AM, Robinson Tryon wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
Hi All,
QA had a talk a few meetings ago about the need for a couple new whiteboard
status', I have added these to the whiteboard wiki page:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BSA/BugReport_De
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> QA had a talk a few meetings ago about the need for a couple new whiteboard
> status', I have added these to the whiteboard wiki page:
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BSA/BugReport_Details#Whiteboard
> ...
> P.S. On my to d
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Another whiteboard status post. Should we just move forward with removing
> bibisect3* whiteboard status'? Now that bibisect40 has everything, there's
> really no need for these.
+1
> My proposal:
>
> bibisectrequest -- needs a bi
Hi,
one of the new Features in 4.1 will be the Photo Album Creator:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/4.1#Impress
It's available in Impress: Insert->Picture->Photo Album
Would you please test and report any bugs you encounter? Please add me
in CC in those bugs.
Also this does
Hello
I replied on the bug.
As I said, I assume the eexpected default behaviour when moving a bug to
ASSIGNED is to be assigned to you, with the ui allowing you to change to
somebody else if needed.
Actually,, by the bugzilla workflow in the wiki, if you assign someone or
take ownership of thez
15 matches
Mail list logo
