Sophie Gautier wrote
> I've discussed the process with our FR team and they are ok to handle it.
Hi!
Great to hear that! All we need now is a list of people, by language, who
can be cc'ed to work on the bug
when it has non English summary and seems to be a valid report at first
sight.
Sophie Gaut
Since last week we're up 10 bugs on our >30 day project. I haven't put in
much time, I expect to put in a lot more this week. We have started a new
QA page with stats, currently only one set but feel free to add more, much
easier to keep track of and report on our progress :)
http://wiki.documentf
Hi all,
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote (23-10-12 17:19)
community building/communication (Cor?):
( - doing some little bits
- considering bug hunt party for 3.7.
- not able to deliver the amount of time that could be considered
enough for community building.
)
- the idea to create to s
Hi,
Sophie Gautier wrote on 2012-10-29 17:21:
I'm not sure we really need it. I know that the mails coming the the QA
list will be managed quiet quickly by our team members. But what we need is:
- no moderation
- the possibility to allow attachments (test/example documents) to the list.
from
Hi Sophie!
Am 29.10.2012 um 17:23 schrieb Sophie Gautier :
> Hi all,
> On 29/10/2012 12:19, Florian Effenberger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Bjoern Michaelsen wrote on 2012-10-29 08:51:
>>
>>> We really should document that more -- there is only one (mostly
>>> irrelevant)
>>> notion of otrs on the wiki
Hi all,
On 29/10/2012 12:19, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Bjoern Michaelsen wrote on 2012-10-29 08:51:
>
>> We really should document that more -- there is only one (mostly
>> irrelevant)
>> notion of otrs on the wiki and searching the website list only shows two
>> obscure references. Th
HI all,
On 23/10/2012 21:50, bfo wrote:
> Bjoern Michaelsen wrote
>> - in theory, it is possible to make the BSA file bugs without the
>> reporter registering (Petr/Bjoern)
>> - without keeping the original reporter in the loop, bug report
>> quality will only get worse
>
> Hi.
> Anonymo
Agreed :)
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote on 2012-10-29 12:40:
A little bit of advertising (e.g. by documentation) sure cant hurt. And it
might also make people realize it to be a good solution for their problems and
prevents reinventing the wheel in other teams -- which we should absolutely
avoid.;)
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:19:51PM +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> OTRS indeed lacks some documentation, but was up to now mostly used
> internally by the admins.
A little bit of advertising (e.g. by documentation) sure cant hurt. And it
might also make people realize it to be a good solution
Hi,
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote on 2012-10-29 08:51:
We really should document that more -- there is only one (mostly irrelevant)
notion of otrs on the wiki and searching the website list only shows two
obscure references. That should definitely change. But even if you have an
account, you likely w
Hi Sophie,
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:34:44PM +0200, Sophie Gautier wrote:
> > https://otrs.documentfoundation.org
>
> and how do I log on this marvelous tool ;-)
I feel your pain. You need an account created by the infrastructure guys.
We really should document that more -- there is only one
11 matches
Mail list logo
