Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Should we use the "QA Contact" field?

2012-09-20 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Roman Eisele schrieb: Is there now a consensus, or a tendency towards a consensus, that we actually should use the “QA Contact” field? Hi, I don't think so, and I don't see any benefit what we can have from adding people there. I know that Joel adds himself for some tracking needs

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Volunteer required for Libreoffice-qa mailing list administration

2012-09-20 Thread Mas
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Rainer Bielefeld < [email protected]> wrote: > Rainer Bielefeld schrieb: > > a volunteer is required >> > > Hi all, > > together with Thorsten I decided that volunteer Florian, who already has > some more experience in the project, should do the job.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Should we use the "QA Contact" field?

2012-09-20 Thread Mas
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Roman Eisele wrote: > Hi all, > > recently I noticed that some of us start actually using the “QA Contact” > field, which was neglected for a long time. So I think I must have missed > something. Is there now a consensus, or a tendency towards a consensus, > that

[Libreoffice-qa] Should we use the "QA Contact" field?

2012-09-20 Thread Roman Eisele
Hi all, recently I noticed that some of us start actually using the “QA Contact” field, which was neglected for a long time. So I think I must have missed something. Is there now a consensus, or a tendency towards a consensus, that we actually should use the “QA Contact” field? Should I put m

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Volunteer required for Libreoffice-qa mailing list administration

2012-09-20 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Rainer Bielefeld schrieb: a volunteer is required Hi all, together with Thorsten I decided that volunteer Florian, who already has some more experience in the project, should do the job. @Hashem Masoud Thank you for your offer and your contribution to the LibreOffice project. Best regards

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2012-09-20 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 18:19 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 04:24:09PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > > * Present: > > + propose new Difficulty: DifficultyHard > > Eek, multiple questions on that: > - What would be the difference to "DifficultyInteresting" in hard > a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2012-09-20 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 04:24:09PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > * Present: > + propose new Difficulty: DifficultyHard Eek, multiple questions on that: - What would be the difference to "DifficultyInteresting" in hard and objective terms? - How do we make sure we would all judge the EasyHa

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2012-09-20 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 04:24:09PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > + gerrit - patch abandonment can only be done by owner or gerrit admin > (Bjoern) please drop, nothing actionable there ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libre

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2012-09-20 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On 09/20/2012 11:24 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: 48366 All Calc/xlsxFILEOPEN for particular .xlsx impossible, "General Error" AI: + opens fine in master, crashes in libreoffice-3-6 (Kohei) Just identified and backported the relevant fix from master to the 3-6 branch w

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Call for Hard Hacks

2012-09-20 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:47:15AM -0700, Joel Madero wrote: > Hi All, > > Sorry for the late notice but this is a call for hard hacks. If you have > one please reply. Hard hack should be: > > 1. Relatively hard ;) > > 2. The more users affected the better > > 3. CONFIRMED (please, no unconfirm

[Libreoffice-qa] Sorry for more unconfirmed bugs from 2011 ...

2012-09-20 Thread Roman Eisele
Hi Joel et all., I am sorry but there are again some UNCONFIRMED bugs from 2011 :-( Why? While browsing all NEW bugs for Mac OS X, I have noticed quite some bugs which have never been confirmed by anybody else besides the original reporter. This also means that these issues have never been re

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.7 RC1 available

2012-09-20 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Dear Community, The Document Foundation is happy to announce the first release candidate of LibreOffice 3.5.7. The upcoming 3.5.7 will be the seventh in a series of frequent bugfix releases for our 3.5 code line. Please be aware that LibreOffice 3.5.7 RC1 is not yet ready for production use, you s