Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Regression test (Moztrap) test case localization temporary solution.

Hi Sophie, Thanks for following this :) I am looking forward to your further input. > I'll test more in depth Moztrap tomorrow. For information, I was > unable to login using Chrome but it was ok with Firefox. How does it look like when failing to login with Chrome? There is an issue related wi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice QA Call 2012-08-24

Hi all, On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 10:44:48PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > -> Doodle query > > Next call: >2012-09-07 1300UTC unless a different time results from the doodle query any suggestions for other timeslots? Please reply with your suggestion until Wednesday, I will open a doo

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice QA Call 2012-08-24

Hi all, here are the minutes of the QA call on 2012-08-24. Additions and corrections most welcome. Best, Bjoern QA Call 2012-08-24 minutes: pending action items: - write update scenario testcase in Litmus/MozTrap (Kendy) - Invite active bugwranglers to next call/QA list, CC Rainer (Bjoer

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hallo Rainer, Am 16.08.2012 17:36, schrieb Michael Meeks: + QA team suggested picking five top-bugs each two weeks in their call, need to be: I suggest bug 53872 [1] concerning base for the next ESC call. [1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53872

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] "LibreOffice 3.7 most annoying bugs" necessary?

Am 25.08.12 10:21, schrieb Rainer Bielefeld: IMHO my little error indicates that, sooner or later, we need to open a new "LibreOffice 3.7 most annoying bugs" bug list ;-). Hi, this MAB proceeding is approved, and I believe we should no longer hesitate to create a a Task Bug for this. The only

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] NEEDINFO Status

Am 25.08.12 14:21, schrieb Bjoern Michaelsen: In general, I agree -- the quicker handling of these incomplete bugs avoids the trouble that the reporter thinks everyting is fine with it and gets angry if it get closed much later. However, while 10 days is usually enough, I would extend to maybe 30

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] NEEDINFO Status

On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 09:40:38AM -0700, Joel Madero wrote: > I like the PLEASETEST status but I know that Bjoern had some > reservations about adding yet another whiteboard status. What would > be the policy if we did this, changing to INVALID after 14 (or > whatever # we agree on) days and then

[Libreoffice-qa] mailing list administration

Today I increased maximum Size for attachments from 40kB to 64kB to avoid problems with attached Bug statistics. CU Rainer ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.free

[Libreoffice-qa] Triaging Update

Hi All, I'd like to extend some help in triaging bugs. I was involved in bug triaging of Mozilla Thunderbird, you can see more info about that here . I can start working on unconfirmed b

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Online update testing

Hi Jan, Am 16.08.2012 15:53, schrieb Jan Holesovsky: Hi Klaus-Juergen, all, I'd like to ask you test the online update a bit. I had to do some larger changes in order to be able to update the 3.5 line to 3.5.6, so now it explicitly preselects 3.5.6 for you, when you try to update from an older