Hi All,
Progress is still going for the unconfirmed bugs but we still needs people
to actively and aggressively help. If you have some time in the coming
weeks take a look at the following document:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApS-XtOUGGH5dDIwaXN1YnNsM0h4RXFKdVhvb2RRb0E
If you c
I will take care of it, I'll put it in a temporary site for now and then
let you and others see it before replacing the current triaging site. I
think everything needs to be in one place (in terms of triaging) with a
nice TOC at the beginning so that a user could reasonably go to one place
and lear
Joel Madero schrieb:
Ultimately I think the whole QA wiki needs redone but we can maybe start
with the triaging section.
Hi Joel,
I think so, too. That has been growing with the project with lots of ad
hoc kludge (most created by me) has been added. That all is very muddled.
Writing manual
I will have to address the full thread in a few hours when I can sit
down and think a bit about this but a couple points:
a) I feel strongly that we should be actively aiming at making the
triaging a more "important" aspect of development and agree with Petr
that we should use priority and sev
I think that we should spread the news by linking your post in the
announce mailing list and in a TDF blog post. I will do it later today,
as I am currently answering some media questions on the subject.
On 08/20/2012 02:40 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as already hinted at in the ESC mi
Florian Reisinger píše v Po 20. 08. 2012 v 14:03 +0300:
> hmm, does that really make sense? I am working through, lets say, 20
> LT NEEDINFO bugs.
>
> Let's say 10% answer (more than this time...): 2 bugs are "saved"...
> AND I wasted my time...
It was not waste of time, definitely. You tried to
Rainer Bielefeld píše v Po 20. 08. 2012 v 13:21 +0200:
> Petr Mladek schrieb:
>
> > I think that we really should set severity and priority.
>
>
> Hi Petr,
>
> a while ago we decided that we should not invest too much time into this
> because of numerous abuse of these flags.
It was during ti
Petr Mladek schrieb:
I think that we really should set severity and priority.
Hi Petr,
a while ago we decided that we should not invest too much time into this
because of numerous abuse of these flags. But indeed, I use Priority for
my workflow (without trusting selected prio too much), an
Hi everyone!
__
Florian Reisinger
Von meinem iPad gesendet
Sent via iPad
Am 20.08.2012 um 13:45 schrieb Michael Meeks :
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 22:14 +0200, Alex Thurgood wrote:
>> My own personal take on this is that if you guys want to regularly
>> schmeiss out bug reports that s
Hi Alex,
On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 22:14 +0200, Alex Thurgood wrote:
> My own personal take on this is that if you guys want to regularly
> schmeiss out bug reports that someone else has happened to sweepingly
> set as NEEDINFO, then I'm wasting my time here in QA.
I agree that the situati
Hi,
I still miss instructions how to set severity, priority, and component
during the bug triage process. I think that we really should do it.
Joel has a great proposal for severity handling at
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/0/06/Prioritizing_Bugs_Flowchart.jpg
The components are well
Hi,
On 20. Aug 2012 00:56, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> [...]
> The first goal of the QA team is [...]
nice statement :-)
I had the impulse to put it in a prominent place on the QA Homepage[1]. Feel
free to complete it or improve wording.
Nino
[1] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA
Hi Roman and Rainer,
Le 2012-08-19 04:29, Rainer Bielefeld a écrit :
Roman Eisele schrieb:
Am 18.08.12 03:57, schrieb Marc Paré:
Would it make sense to add "Accessibility" as another component to the
Bug Assistant? Maybe this would encourage people to submit more
accessibility bugs? Not to men
13 matches
Mail list logo
