Hi all,
we want to encourage users to report and to confirm LibreOffice bugs.
One important factor whether we will be successful with that attempt is
that users get a quick response to their reports. To reach this goal, it
would be great if 1 … 2 volunteers could watch Bugzilla for new 3.6.0
Hi,
with the new Version picker items your Atom feeds containing Version
picker contents will not work any longer, because the picker contents
references now will be invalid. You will have to renew the feeds.
This also might affect feeds used in the Wiki.
Questions, remarks and discussion pl
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 3.6.0, we today upload a second beta2
build that is (almost) feature-complete. For further milestones on the
way towards 3.6.0, please refer to our release plan timings here:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.6_release
Builds are now being uploa
Joel Madero píše v St 20. 06. 2012 v 08:08 -0700:
> Thanks for the advice. I thought I had included the qa list, my
> mistake. As for the length, I agree and I almost didn't include it but
> that was an email in response to mine so I felt a bit obligated to
> respond despite the length.
If only I
Thanks for the advice. I thought I had included the qa list, my mistake. As
for the length, I agree and I almost didn't include it but that was an
email in response to mine so I felt a bit obligated to respond despite the
length.
I had another side question, the response to the thread was made her
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:10:27PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
> why is it necessary to have distribution specific builds for testing?
AFAIK Kendy want to get rid of "universal builds" anyway.
> http://www.libreoffice.org/download/?type=rpm-x86_64&lang=en-US&version=3.6.0
>
> is there a lack of
> - we need more beta testers
> AI:- Are there any Bug Hunting Sessions in the pipe? (Cors)
>- SUSE will prepare packages for the beta for testing too (Petr)
> AI: - Could Fedora do this too? (Caolan?)
why is it necessary to have distribution specific builds for testing?
ev
Hi Joel,
Joel Madero píše v Út 19. 06. 2012 v 13:36 -0700:
> I moved this to a new thread because the subject here didn't really
> accurately portray the direction of the conversation
The mail includes many good questions and proposals that might move us
forward. I'll try to answer it later this
