Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Alpha1 available from ppa [was: LibreOffice 3.6.0 ALPHA1 test builds available]

On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 12:26:55AM +0530, dE . wrote: > Are these static builds? Cause when extracting from RPMs, they complained > of missing libpng on Gentoo. Ubuntu Precise builds are for Ubuntu Precise and nothing else. That being said, this alpha release contains a packaging bug still that ma

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.6.0 ALPHA1 test builds available

On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 10:45:51AM -0700, Pedro wrote: > Does "Bad luck" mean "Tough luck for Windows 2000 users because we are not > even going to try to fix that"? Please refrain from this passive aggressive tone. Also please consider yourself part of "we". Best, Bjoern ___

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Alpha1 available from ppa [was: LibreOffice 3.6.0 ALPHA1 test builds available]

Are these static builds? Cause when extracting from RPMs, they complained of missing libpng on Gentoo. - Support software for non profit, buy Android phones. On Jun 6, 2012 1:39 PM, "Bjoern Michaelsen" wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:16:15AM +0200, Bjoern Mich

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.6.0 ALPHA1 test builds available

Andras Timar-3 wrote > > Yeah, it is a 3 x 10 pixel object on Windows 2000. At least it can be > closed with Alt+F4. Bad luck. > You can also dismiss it by pressing Esc, but that is not the point. Does "Bad luck" mean "Tough luck for Windows 2000 users because we are not even going to try to f

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Bugzilla Version Picker items – 2

On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 04:47:28PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 12:11 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > > Petr Mladek schrieb: > > "rc" should not appear in Help/About", that's an additional info added > > to Bugzilla Version like "Master". > > yes > > > > Could we use the sa

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.5.99.1 tag created (3.6.0-beta1)

Hi, there have been created the libreoffice-3.5.99.1 tag for 3.6.0-beta1 release. The corresponding official builds will be available within next few days. See the attached list of changes against 3.6.0-alpha1. See also http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.6 Now, you might switch y

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Bugzilla Version Picker items – 2

On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 12:11 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > Petr Mladek schrieb: > "rc" should not appear in Help/About", that's an additional info added > to Bugzilla Version like "Master". yes > > Could we use the same scheme also in bugzilla? I mean: > > > > 3.5.98.1 (3.6.0alpha1) > >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Bugzilla Version Picker items – 2

Petr Mladek schrieb: Well, it looks a bit ugly. In addition, we can't mention "rc" because it must not appear in the final build. H Petr, thank you for your detailled comment. I will have to check all details later, here some first thoughts: "rc" should not appear in Help/About", that's an

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Bugzilla Version Picker items – 2

Hi Rainer, let me to move the dicussion to the mail. We need an operative solution and I think that a mail is better for it. On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 18:01 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > Hi, > > Houston, we have had a problem :-( > > Can you please have a look at my Problem in >