Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Mistake in Official download page

Hi Pedro, Le 2012-06-03 10:24, Pedro a écrit : Hi guys The official download page still says "This is a pre-release version not meant for genereal use." (spelling error included) http://www.libreoffice.org/download http://ask.libreoffice.org/question/3072/why-this-is-a-pre-release-version alth

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Gerrit auto-merge

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:02 AM, David Tardon wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:51:25AM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: >> So -- people with commit rights are not the issue: >> - can commit directly to master on their own responsibility >>   (this should be discouraged, except for urgent buildbre

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Gerrit auto-merge

On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:51:25AM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > So -- people with commit rights are not the issue: > - can commit directly to master on their own responsibility > (this should be discouraged, except for urgent buildbreaker fixes that save >everyone pain) Do I see the beg

[Libreoffice-qa] Mistake in Official download page

Hi guys The official download page still says "This is a pre-release version not meant for genereal use." (spelling error included) http://www.libreoffice.org/download http://ask.libreoffice.org/question/3072/why-this-is-a-pre-release-version although version 3.5.4 was announced on the 30th of

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Testing 3.6.0alpha1

Hi Rainer, Rainer Bielefeld wrote (03-06-12 13:27) we were not lucky, most users will not be able to do “real life tests” that version because of “Bug 48946 – not find JRE”. I doubt that we will any Bug report for that version because of tests with Alpha1. I thought we had introduced the alpha

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Testing 3.6.0alpha1

Rainer, Getting a build out of the door is a non-trivial amount of work. There is no way we want to block resources like this just 2 days before feature freeze. It will for sure be fixed in beta1, and with the work-arounds that are floating around, one should be able to test alpha1 too. Cheers F

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [PUSHED] fdo#48946 was: Testing 3.6.0alpha1

Pushed, thanks for it. Just wondering what went wrong. Did the gbuildification of the module change the library name? Anyway, thanks for tracking it down F. On 03/06/12 13:50, David Ostrovsky wrote: > Hi, > > On 03.06.2012 13:27, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we were not lucky, most user

[Libreoffice-qa] [PATCH] fdo#48946 was: Testing 3.6.0alpha1

Hi, On 03.06.2012 13:27, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Hi, we were not lucky, most users will not be able to do “real life tests” that version because of “Bug 48946 – not find JRE”. I doubt that we will any Bug report for that version because of tests with Alpha1. I looked at it and it turns out

[Libreoffice-qa] Testing 3.6.0alpha1

Hi, we were not lucky, most users will not be able to do “real life tests” that version because of “Bug 48946 – not find JRE”. I doubt that we will any Bug report for that version because of tests with Alpha1. What do you think about an alpha2? More details and a poll here:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Spell check problems after update

Am 02.06.12 08:09, schrieb Rainer Bielefeld: > Hi all, > > I observe a remarkable number of bug reports concerning spell check > problems after update during the last days. Unfortunately quality of > those reports is lousy, so that it is difficult to find out what the > reason might be, but I am p