dE . wrote (24-04-12 07:25)
What I suggest is a metabug for interoperability issues. These issues
[..]
Ah, that is what I meant indeed!
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@l
dE . wrote (24-04-12 07:28)
No, I came to the conclusion via market statistics. If I want to see a
complex doc(x), xls(x), ppt(x) etc... I use google docs... I've no
issues, and for exports I use PDF.
So this issue generally matters the most.
I agree that interoperability is one of the import
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (25-04-12 07:47)
I believe OfficeUser had a bad day when he wrote that lousy bad and
incomplete report with wild speculations instead of reviewable facts.
We should not attach great importance to that matter with the
unfortunate subject line and wrong conclusion.
I see
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 01:43:57PM +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
> And developers, are they helped with the more precise info?
In less than 1% of the cases, so: no.
Best,
Bjoern
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [email protected]
Petr Mladek wrote (24-04-12 18:19)
related: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48659
Also https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43031 is kind of
related. Heh, I am afraid that the many information could break the
improved layout again ;-)
Not funny IMO.. However:
Well, I a
