On 04/24/12 21:25, Petr Mladek wrote:
Hi dE,
I am happy to read this because I see a nice solution from what you
wrote.
dE . píše v Út 24. 04. 2012 v 10:55 +0530:
On 04/23/12 20:47, Michael Meeks wrote:
Yes, absolutely, the MAB should be in a reasonable limit such that it
looks 'solvable'.
Ex
Am 25.04.12 13:44, schrieb Nino Novak:
>> File a bug, but probably this's a upstream problem.
>
> done: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49139
Thank you very much! I hope they can fix this ...
Roman
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing lis
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 23:24 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
I think we could use some help dealing with an ugly personal attack
disguised as a bug report.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49115
It's a bug reporter like this that makes me lose hope in a FOSS
project such as this one.
P
Hi Michael,
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 14:37 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
> i'd prefer something more specific like "office-interop" "msft-interop"
> "mso-interop" or whatever because there are other things we need to
> interop with as well even if they may be less important :)
Sounds reasonabl
On 25/04/12 11:33, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 17:55 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
>> In this case, I prefer using whiteboard instead of metabug:
>
> Easy for me to query too.
>
>> + "inter-operability" into "Whiteboard" for all these bugs
>
> Gosh that's a long
On Wednesday 25 April 2012, 15:37:43 dE . wrote:
> File a bug, but probably this's a upstream problem.
done: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49139
Nino
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [email protected]
On 04/24/12 15:44, Roman wrote:
Am 23.04.12 12:38, schrieb Nino Novak:
in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48329 the second attachment
(help_poster.doc) has been uploaded by user mikebgx, as shown correctly in the
entry in the "Attachments section" on top.
However comment #3 pretend
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 16:54 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> There is strong conflicting opinion between Bjoern and Rainer. I suggest
> to decide this on the ESC or QA meeting.
It's on the agenda.
> BTW: There was wrongly described Novell bugzilla. In fact, it has the
> best solution, I have
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 17:55 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> In this case, I prefer using whiteboard instead of metabug:
Easy for me to query too.
> + "inter-operability" into "Whiteboard" for all these bugs
Gosh that's a long string; how about 'interop' :-)
> + and mayb
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 23:24 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> I think we could use some help dealing with an ugly personal attack
> disguised as a bug report.
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49115
>
> It's a bug reporter like this that makes me lose hope in a FOSS
> project such as this
Pedro píše v St 25. 04. 2012 v 00:16 -0700:
> klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote
> >
> > So the very least is that if OfficeUser had a bad day he had to say
> > "Sorry".
> >
>
> He already said Sorry and volunteered to change the summary in Comment
> number 4.
Hmm, he said sorry but the very next
klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote
>
> So the very least is that if OfficeUser had a bad day he had to say
> "Sorry".
>
He already said Sorry and volunteered to change the summary in Comment
number 4.
In any case it was Markus himself who considered it was his fault in
comment #6 and #8 here
htt
Hi Rainer, Kohei, Markus,
Am 25.04.2012 07:47, schrieb Rainer Bielefeld:
Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
I think we could use some help dealing with an ugly personal attack
disguised as a bug report.
Hello Kohei,
I believe OfficeUser had a bad day when he wrote that lousy bad and
incomplete report w
13 matches
Mail list logo
