On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 04:15:40PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Bjoern Michaelsen píše v Pá 20. 04. 2012 v 00:16 +0200:
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:23:46PM +0200, Nino Novak wrote:
> > > the question emerged, if reassigning a NEEDINFO-bug to the presumed info
> > > provider[1] is Good or Bad. Pl
El 20/04/12 17:32, Thorsten Behrens escribió:
MiguelAngel wrote:
Seems the file:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/win/x86/LibO_3.5.3rc1_Win_x86_helppack_en-US.msi
doesn't download, also en-GB and other, they open as text file,
Can you try again, added explicit mimetype to httpd c
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:11:18 +0200, Michael Meeks
wrote:
*
+ LibO 4.0
+ planned to be incrementally developed / migrated anyway
+ postpone until license change done (Bjoern)
+ concerns about breaking all extensions at once (Norbert)
MiguelAngel wrote:
> Seems the file:
> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/win/x86/LibO_3.5.3rc1_Win_x86_helppack_en-US.msi
> doesn't download, also en-GB and other, they open as text file,
>
Can you try again, added explicit mimetype to httpd conf for
msi/msp/msm ?
Cheers,
-- Thorste
El 20/04/12 16:51, Pedro escribió:
mariosv wrote
Seems the file:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/win/x86/LibO_3.5.3rc1_Win_x86_helppack_en-US.msi
Must be your browser (or download program). Downloaded and installed without
any problem.
--
View this message in context:
http:
On Friday 20 April 2012, 16:42:19 MiguelAngel wrote:
> Seems the file:
> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/win/x86/LibO_3.5.3rc1_Win_x86
> _helppack_en-US.msi doesn't download, also en-GB and other, they open as
> text file,
For me, it works well (Linux, FF 11).
But the server retu
mariosv wrote
>
> Seems the file:
> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/win/x86/LibO_3.5.3rc1_Win_x86_helppack_en-US.msi
>
Must be your browser (or download program). Downloaded and installed without
any problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org
El 20/04/12 15:35, Pedro escribió:
Fridrich Strba-3 wrote
(following words copyrighted by Thorsten)
In the spirit of LibreOffice shouldn't these words be licensed under CC by
SA? :)
Just updated successfully to LibreOffice 3.5.3.1 under Windows XP Pro x86
Sp3 ;)
A quick note of recognitio
Bjoern Michaelsen píše v Pá 20. 04. 2012 v 00:16 +0200:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:23:46PM +0200, Nino Novak wrote:
> > the question emerged, if reassigning a NEEDINFO-bug to the presumed info
> > provider[1] is Good or Bad. Please advise.
> >
> > Nino
> > [1]
> > https://wiki.documentfoundatio
Hi!
I just found a bug, which goes back to the latest OO.org version I have
(2.3.0). (See bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48968 )
Which version should I take? Should we introduce OO.org versions?
I thought about it and I think it should be
a) 3.4.6 (The oldest LibO version I tes
Fridrich Strba-3 wrote
>
> (following words copyrighted by Thorsten)
>
In the spirit of LibreOffice shouldn't these words be licensed under CC by
SA? :)
Just updated successfully to LibreOffice 3.5.3.1 under Windows XP Pro x86
Sp3 ;)
A quick note of recognition to the Devs for fixing the mism
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 3.5.3, the RC1 builds now start to be
available on pre-releases. This build is slated to be first release
candidate build on the way towards 3.5.3, please refer to our release
plan timings here:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.5_release
Builds
Hi there,
you may be interested in joining our call this afternoon?
Pls see
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/2012-April/001508.html
Cheers,
Cor
[email protected] wrote (20-04-12 09:25)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
--- Comment #291 from
13 matches
Mail list logo
