Good morning Jan,
Am 02.04.2012 17:55, schrieb Jan Holesovsky:
Hi Klaus-Jürgen,
On 2012-04-02 at 17:14 +0200, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote:
Please, is here anybody who can check whether the 3.5.1 Online Update is
working? How to test:
- install 3.5.1 _RC1_ (for Windows, or other)
- trigger
Is there a way to tell LibreOfficePortable that it should not show
updates although they are not available for the portable version?
Marc
Am 02.04.2012 17:55, schrieb Jan Holesovsky:
Hi Klaus-Jürgen,
On 2012-04-02 at 17:14 +0200, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote:
Please, is here anybody who ca
Shahar Or schrieb:
Great[1]. Just one thing, please. There's a difference in results
between the link you gave above ([1]) and the link supplied in the
QA-FAQ.
Hi,
may be there is some misunderstanding? Link [1] in my posting 31.03.2012
08:24 only shows 1 example with 1 Bug
Link [11] in F
Hi Rainer,
(renaming this to "bug tagging" as my reply is not specific to RTL)
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 01:48:16PM +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> Here some more arguments against a change (by the moment)
> a) I can't see a real problem, so we should not change a running
>system without need
Hi Klaus-Jürgen,
On 2012-04-02 at 17:14 +0200, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote:
> > Please, is here anybody who can check whether the 3.5.1 Online Update is
> > working? How to test:
> >
> > - install 3.5.1 _RC1_ (for Windows, or other)
> > - trigger Online Update from the Help menu
> > - expected
Hi Kendy,
Am 07.03.2012 12:41, schrieb Jan Holesovsky:
Hi there,
Please, is here anybody who can check whether the 3.5.1 Online Update is
working? How to test:
- install 3.5.1 _RC1_ (for Windows, or other)
- trigger Online Update from the Help menu
- expected result: LibreOffice reports that t
Hi *,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
> [...]
> it would be great if somebody could test if both native folder and file
> picker still work as they did before (e.g. compare with 3.5 branch) on
> the various supported Windows releases.
Nor sure whether it is still an issue, b
Petr Mladek wrote
>
> Why could it cause bad image? IMHO, it was bug on the Secunia side and
> it is fixed now. We used this version scheme also for LO-3.4 and nobody
> complained.
>
A bug on the Secunia side that LO version 3.5.1 and 3.5.2 are named 3.5.0? I
have to disagree...
As I mentioned
Pedro Lino píše v Čt 29. 03. 2012 v 19:06 +0100:
> Hi all,
>
> Did anyone verify that the version info is updated (re the
> secunia
> reports problem)
>
>
> I think Secunia has already fixed the numbering so that the warning it
> gone for version 3.5.1.
>
> But t
Hi all,
LibO 3.4 lifecycle is terminated, but currently there still are some 3.4
Most annoying bugs open. That's useless, there will be no more 3.4.
releases, so we will have to decide whether they are really MAB (then
they should be listed under 3.5. MAB) and what circumstances might
hinder
10 matches
Mail list logo