Hi all,
here are the minutes of the QA call 2012-03-09 15:00 UTC
attendants: Cor, Ivan, Rainer, Markus, Michael, Korrawit, Petr, Kendy, Bjoern
- structured manual testing:
- getting testcases for 3.5 from Litmus to Checkbox
- we currently have some ~50 testcases in Litmus -- it shoul
X Congreso Ciencia y Espíritu Valencia
- Valencia 24 y 25 de Marzo de 2012 en la Sala
Carolina -
Hacia una humanidad más honesta, más
2012.03.09 17:28, Pedro rašė:
Christian Lohmaier-2 wrote
it is the server that
makes the decision whether there is an update, not LibreOffice.
LibreOffice just displays the server's response.
So the server response needs to be fixed to properly identify my current RC1
as 3.5.1.1?
If LO sets tw
X Congreso Ciencia y Espíritu Valencia
- Valencia 24 y 25 de Marzo de 2012 en la Sala
Carolina -
Hacia una humanidad más honesta, más
Christian Lohmaier-2 wrote
>
> it is the server that
> makes the decision whether there is an update, not LibreOffice.
> LibreOffice just displays the server's response.
>
So the server response needs to be fixed to properly identify my current RC1
as 3.5.1.1?
If LO sets two update channels th
Hi Christian,
On Friday 09 March 2012, 15:17:26 Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> it is the server that
> makes the decision whether there is an update, not LibreOffice.
> LibreOffice just displays the server's response.
ah, ok, I see!
thanks for clarification ;-)
Bye,
Nino
_
Hi Nino, *,
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
> On Friday 09 March 2012, 03:57:48 Pedro wrote:
> [...]
> For a 3.5.1 instal it should only report when a 3.5.2 (final!) update is
> available.
>
> (So the test is "not passed" in my eyes)
>
> Or does the notifyer behave different in
Nino wrote
>
> No, it should do nothing - from the end user point of view.
>
> For a 3.5.1 instal it should only report when a 3.5.2 (final!) update is
> available.
>
> (So the test is "not passed" in my eyes)
>
> Or does the notifyer behave different in RCs? (If so, it's not an RC!)
>
>Fr
On Friday 09 March 2012, 03:57:48 Pedro wrote:
> ol klaus-jürgen weghorn wrote
>
> > Works now officially with RC2.
>
> It does indeed. But the Update message is still confusing...
>
> "LibreOffice 3.5.1 RC2 is available.
>
> The installed version is LibreOffice 3.5.1."
>
> Why would someone
ol klaus-jürgen weghorn wrote
>
> Works now officially with RC2.
>
It does indeed. But the Update message is still confusing...
"LibreOffice 3.5.1 RC2 is available.
The installed version is LibreOffice 3.5.1."
Why would someone who already has version 3.5.1 would want to update to an
RC rele
Hi Jan,
Am 07.03.2012 13:58, schrieb Jan Holesovsky:
Hi Pedro, Klaus-Juergen, Cor, all,
On 2012-03-07 at 11:47 +, Pedro Lino wrote:
Working perfectly under Win XP Pro x86 SP3, except that the
Pre-release page still shows RC1...
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/
Thank you
Nino Novak píše v St 07. 03. 2012 v 21:47 +0100:
> If we could manage to put together a system that supports such mutual hand
> washing, it would be fine. But without, I'm a bit lost, how to organize this.
> OTOH, pure Test Case gathering could simply be started in the wiki. So I'd
> tend to sta
Bjoern Michaelsen píše v St 07. 03. 2012 v 12:48 +0100:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 08:42:10AM +0100, Nino Novak wrote:
> > An additional (possibly somewhat crazy) idea: To gather test cases from the
> > community by asking "What functionality do *you* want to be tested? Provide
> > a
> > well-tho
klaus-jürgen weghorn ol píše v Čt 08. 03. 2012 v 12:34 +0100:
> Hi Ndlsas, all,
> have I lost a discussion?
> Why was the Litmus-link put off the wiki menu [1]?
It was removed without any explanation. Maybe, the user just had another
concept what belongs to this menu.
> Maybe we can comment it ou
14 matches
Mail list logo
