Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice QA call 2012-03-09 15:00 UTC

Hi Bjoern, Thanks for inviting and coordinating everything ( sorry for the late reply, it was a busy week ) :) I'll try to join when it is possible, though the time could be a bit late in China. An obstacle is I am not sure if it is possible to make a call successfully from home ( I don't have a t

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice QA call 2012-03-09 15:00 UTC

Hi, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote (07-03-12 13:04) On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:55:10AM +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: I have some explicit ideas on some of the items. Should we attempt to exchange those before the meeting, or at least mention them (briefly)? In general, just mention a new topic as a onelin

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice QA call 2012-03-09 15:00 UTC

Hi Bjoern, all, On Wednesday 07 March 2012, 12:48:25 Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 08:42:10AM +0100, Nino Novak wrote: > > [test case tagging] > > Noted. Thanks :-) > We will discuss that on the call. If time allows, fine. But on the call you should (IMHO) focus on stra

[Libreoffice-qa] Migrationsleitfaden des Bundes (Migration Guide)

Hi, today I got a hint by Mike Schinagl that the new "Migrationsleitfaden des Bundes" 4.0 has been released. Some comments in German you find here , you can download the document from

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.4.6.1 tag created (3.4.6-rc1)

Hi, there have been created the libreoffice-3.4.6.1 tag for 3.4.6-rc1 release. The corresponding official builds will be available within next few days. See the attached list of changes against 3.4.5-final. Now, you might switch your current 3-4 source tree to it using: ./g fetch --tags ./g ch

[Libreoffice-qa] [TESTED] Re: 3.5.1 Online Update testing

Hi Pedro, Klaus-Juergen, Cor, all, On 2012-03-07 at 11:47 +, Pedro Lino wrote: > Working perfectly under Win XP Pro x86 SP3, except that the > Pre-release page still shows RC1... > http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/ Thank you for checking! I've disabled it for now, and will e

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice QA call 2012-03-09 15:00 UTC

On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:55:10AM +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > I have some explicit ideas on some of the items. > Should we attempt to exchange those before the meeting, or at least > mention them (briefly)? In general, just mention a new topic as a oneliner to add to the agenda. If its something sp

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 3.5.1 Online Update testing

Hi Cor, On 2012-03-07 at 12:58 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > > Please, is here anybody who can check whether the 3.5.1 Online Update is > > working? How to test: > > > > - install 3.5.1 _RC1_ (for Windows, or other) > > - trigger Online Update from the Help menu > > - expected result: LibreOffice re

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 3.5.1 Online Update testing

Hi Kendy, Am 07.03.2012 12:41, schrieb Jan Holesovsky: Hi there, Please, is here anybody who can check whether the 3.5.1 Online Update is working? How to test: - install 3.5.1 _RC1_ (for Windows, or other) - trigger Online Update from the Help menu - expected result: LibreOffice reports that t

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 3.5.1 Online Update testing

Hi Kendy, Jan Holesovsky wrote (07-03-12 12:41) Please, is here anybody who can check whether the 3.5.1 Online Update is working? How to test: - install 3.5.1 _RC1_ (for Windows, or other) - trigger Online Update from the Help menu - expected result: LibreOffice reports that there is an updat

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice QA call 2012-03-09 15:00 UTC

Hi Nino, On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 08:42:10AM +0100, Nino Novak wrote: > I'd like to add a typical requirement/wish from an occasional tester: > - to have an easy way to set up an individual collection of test cases which > can be reused (first idea: e.g. by tagging them), so that everybody sees, w

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 3.5.1 Online Update testing

Hi Kendy Working perfectly under Win XP Pro x86 SP3, except that the Pre-release page still shows RC1... http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/ Regards, Pedro On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Hi there, > > Please, is here anybody who can check whether the 3.5

[Libreoffice-qa] 3.5.1 Online Update testing

Hi there, Please, is here anybody who can check whether the 3.5.1 Online Update is working? How to test: - install 3.5.1 _RC1_ (for Windows, or other) - trigger Online Update from the Help menu - expected result: LibreOffice reports that there is an update available to 3.5.1 RC2 Please let me k

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice QA call 2012-03-09 15:00 UTC

Hi, On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:08:03AM +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote: > For Checkbox we are waiting for an experienced/skilled QA member to > write the tests, will we have this person for the call? I hope both Nicholas Skaggs and Yifan Jiang will be able to join the call so that we can work out wha

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice QA call 2012-03-09 15:00 UTC

Hi Bjoern, all, On 07/03/2012 02:45, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: Hi all, I would like to set up a LibreOffice QA call to streamline our QA efforts. I propose to make our first call on: Friday, 2012-03-09 15:00 UTC I hope to repeat this call biweekly to discuss and coordinate ongoing QA issues,

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.1 RC2 pre-available

Hi *, for the upcoming new version 3.5.1, the RC2 builds now start to be available on pre-releases. This build is slated to be second release candidate build on the way towards 3.5.1, please refer to our release plan timings here: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.5_release Build

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice QA call 2012-03-09 15:00 UTC

Hi Bjoern, *, Thanks for the invitation and the initiative! Bjoern Michaelsen wrote (07-03-12 02:45) I would like to set up a LibreOffice QA call to streamline our QA efforts. I propose to make our first call on: Friday, 2012-03-09 15:00 UTC As life shows now, I'll be able to join. And I'

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice QA call 2012-03-09 15:00 UTC

On Wednesday 07 March 2012, 08:42:10 Nino Novak wrote: > Some ideas/wishes/comments from an interested layman: just an additional thought: is there a possibility to define certain "test paths"? Mean, some kind of "sophisticated" test case which - if passed - "contains" a couple of "simple" tes