Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Blocker in 3.5.0Beta3?

Andras Timar-3 wrote > >> If not, should I report this as a blocker? > > Please report that bug with pt-BR and assign it to me. > Bug added to the tracker https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44915 I included the information by Olivier in the Comments. But maybe it is better that Oli

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Blocker in 3.5.0Beta3?

Hi, 2012/1/18 Pedro : > Hi all > > While installing LO 3.5.0Beta3 today in my Win XP Home x86 pt-PT netbook I > noticed that the installer only starts in Portuguese for a brief second and > then switches to English. > > I had never tried a 3.5.x build in that netbook and after quickly testing > wi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Blocker in 3.5.0Beta3?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I second that for pt-BR The installer is in english and my Win XP is in pt-BR. The help pack is in pt-BR though... Thanks Olivier Em 18-01-2012 15:00, Pedro escreveu: > Hi all > > While installing LO 3.5.0Beta3 today in my Win XP Home x86 pt-PT n

[Libreoffice-qa] Blocker in 3.5.0Beta3?

Hi all While installing LO 3.5.0Beta3 today in my Win XP Home x86 pt-PT netbook I noticed that the installer only starts in Portuguese for a brief second and then switches to English. I had never tried a 3.5.x build in that netbook and after quickly testing with Beta1 and Beta2 I conclude that th

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.5.0.1 tag created (3.5.0-rc1)

Just to remind you that with this fact, the libreoffice-3-5 branch needs 1 signoff to push stuff. Cheers Fridrich On 18/01/12 10:39, Fridrich Strba wrote: Hi, there have been created the libreoffice-3.5.0.1 tag for 3.5.0-rc1 release. The corresponding official builds will be available within

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.5.0.1 tag created (3.5.0-rc1)

Hi, there have been created the libreoffice-3.5.0.1 tag for 3.5.0-rc1 release. The corresponding official builds will be available within 3 days or so. See the attached list of changes against 3.5.0-beta3. See also the schedule at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.5_release and

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.0 Beta3 available

Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > I think that by default you do not get tag that you don't 'need' ... > so if a tag is put, a posteriori, on a commit you already have you > won't automatically get it. > git fetch --tags is your friend here. :) Cheers, -- Thorsten pgp3ZfLkKyXTL.pgp Description: PGP s

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Online update service up & running

Pedro wrote: > The problem with pushing after announcing is a marketing issue: If you > announce and it's not available, anxious people get more anxious. If you > push to servers before announcing, anxious people will already have it and > the announcement sounds a bit ridiculous :) > Well, ideall