Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] Improving the QA and Release for 3.5

2011-11-22 Thread Rob Snelders
No those days aren't the only way to test. But it is a way to get more people to test the software and to test the software in ways that the developers won't think about. I think there are enough people that want to help but don't know how, and testing is a easy way to step in. At last I also

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] Improving the QA and Release for 3.5

2011-11-22 Thread Petr Mladek
Cor Nouws píše v So 19. 11. 2011 v 16:56 +0100: > Cor Nouws wrote (13-11-11 21:20) > > Rainer Bielefeld wrote (11-11-11 20:06) > > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Improving_QA-Release-3.5 > > >> I'm afraid "Try to get more testers doing the testing earlier" will be > >> the critical/limiti

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Test Structure in Litmus

2011-11-22 Thread Petr Mladek
Yifan Jiang píše v Út 22. 11. 2011 v 18:36 +0800: > Yes, I have already created several test cases in master/L10n/en covering: Great! > - Spellcheck & Grammarcheck I like that you link test files from git, e.g. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/test-files/plain/writer/litmus/la

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Test Structure in Litmus

2011-11-22 Thread Yifan Jiang
Hi Petr, On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 09:55:35AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > IMHO, if nobody objects within next 2-3 days, we could branch it for 3.5 > release, so people could enter test cases for the 3.5 features. Sure :) > > - Master Function branch > > > > - 8 test groups, only test

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Test Structure in Litmus

2011-11-22 Thread Petr Mladek
Yifan Jiang píše v Út 22. 11. 2011 v 10:35 +0800: > Hi Petr, Rimas and all, > > Besides the comments in the bottom, I also did Litmus update yesterday: Great. Thanks for doing this. > - Master Feature branch > > - The empty branch has exactly the same structure of its Function >