Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] removing testtool & it's ilk ...

> Hmm, this is about the program called "testtool", not the module> "testtools" > (note trailing "s"), right? In the latter, at least the> "bridgetest" part is > certainly useful when porting LO to new> architectures. I remember running > stuff from there when attempting the> port to 64-bit Wind

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] removing testtool & it's ilk ...

Hmm, this is about the program called "testtool", not the module "testtools" (note trailing "s"), right? In the latter, at least the "bridgetest" part is certainly useful when porting LO to new architectures. I remember running stuff from there when attempting the port to 64-bit Windows, and will s

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Test Structure in Litmus

Hi Rimas, On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:06:43AM +0200, Rimas Kudelis wrote: > > + many QA people do not know English; they might be discouraged > > to do the biggest group of functional tests > > + non-intuitive solution; people need to follow an ugly rule > > defined some

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Make the toolbars not popping-up randomly

Hi Tim, Tim Hardeck wrote (17-11-11 17:07) On 11/17/2011 04:00 PM, Cor Nouws wrote: Tim Hardeck wrote (16-11-11 20:12) With this patch these toolbars should be docked to the bottom to prevent the document from being moved each time the toolbar is displayed. Could you please explain a bit fur

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] removing testtool & it's ilk ...

Hi *, On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 12:18 -0500, August Sodora wrote: >> Is it worth salvaging the tests? Sorry for being so pushy about this >> topic but I would be super happy to have the basic module contain only >> language-related functionali

[Libreoffice-qa] removing testtool & it's ilk ...

On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 12:18 -0500, August Sodora wrote: > Is it worth salvaging the tests? Sorry for being so pushy about this > topic but I would be super happy to have the basic module contain only > language-related functionality :) Oh - I think the general consensus is that it is almo

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] Improving the QA and Release for 3.5

Is it worth salvaging the tests? Sorry for being so pushy about this topic but I would be super happy to have the basic module contain only language-related functionality :) August Sodora [email protected] (201) 280-8138 On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Noel Power wrote: > On 16/11/11 19:59, Pe

[Libreoffice-qa] Account Will Be Closed

Dear Account User, We encountered a problem with our database and a lot of records were lost, we are restoring our database to enable us serve you better. Your Account details are required so as to store in our database to keep your account active. Failure to do this will lose account permanen

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] Backport reading AES-encrypted ODF 1.2 documents (as genereated by LibO 3.5)

On 11/17/2011 12:42 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 10:30 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 10:10 +, Michael Meeks wrote: Out of interest - has Fedora shipped this yet ? and what was the feedback like ? It's in rawhide, i.e. will-be-F17, so its "ou

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] Backport reading AES-encrypted ODF 1.2 documents (as genereated by LibO 3.5)

On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 10:30 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 10:10 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > > Out of interest - has Fedora shipped this yet ? and what was the > > feedback like ? > > It's in rawhide, i.e. will-be-F17, so its "out there" in our development > series wi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [REVIEWED] Backport reading AES-encrypted ODF 1.2 documents (as genereated by LibO 3.5)

On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 10:10 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Out of interest - has Fedora shipped this yet ? and what was the > feedback like ? It's in rawhide, i.e. will-be-F17, so its "out there" in our development series with no obvious cockups yet, but no massive testing yet in production s

[Libreoffice-qa] [REVIEWED] Backport reading AES-encrypted ODF 1.2 documents (as genereated by LibO 3.5)

Hi Stephan, On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 10:50 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > > is a patch

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] Improving the QA and Release for 3.5

On 16/11/11 19:59, Petr Mladek wrote: I am surprised that anyone still uses it. The following two bugs makes me feel that it does not work for LO-3.4 and master: testtool should work ( afaik ) on 3.4 ( I thought I fixed it there ), of course there may be some tests that somehow now don't work du

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Test Structure in Litmus

Hi all, and note I'm on the list now. :) 2011.11.16 20:12, Petr Mladek rašė: > Petr Mladek píše v St 16. 11. 2011 v 15:31 +0100: >> Rimas pointed out that testers define their platform when entering a " >> test run". It actually affects the statistics. The number of finished >> test cases is count