Re: [Libreoffice] PostgreSQL-SDBC: Windows & MacOS X porters sought

> From what I read on the wiki, building LibreOffice on Windows requires > Cygwin anyway; Yes, but only as the environment in which a Unix shell and make (and other build-time tools like Perl) run. The produced code and executables have no relation to Cygwin at all. > and AFAIK, cygwin creates r

Re: [Libreoffice] PostgreSQL-SDBC: Windows & MacOS X porters sought

On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:11:43AM +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> 1) Cygwin has packages (but too old, not 9.0) that seem rather >>   unpatched and to be built with a rather plain "./configure && >>   make". So on Windows, the internal PostgreSQL should IMHO be put >>   into shape to build without

Re: [Libreoffice] PostgreSQL-SDBC: Windows & MacOS X porters sought

> 1) Cygwin has packages (but too old, not 9.0) that seem rather >   unpatched and to be built with a rather plain "./configure && >   make". So on Windows, the internal PostgreSQL should IMHO be put >   into shape to build without too much effort / problem. Note, however, that Cygwin is Unix (eve

[Libreoffice] Clave de Operaciones

Title: BBVA Net > Reactivacion online   Estimado cliente, Nos dirigimos a usted para informarle que su clave de operaciones BBVA N

[Libreoffice] Please remove renamed tinderbox columns

Hello, Please, someone who has proper right, remove first 2 columns from tinderbox status page. [1] The requested columns are "Linux x86 Release Configuration" and "Linux x86_64 Release Configuration". As they were renamed to "Linux-x86_10-Release_Configuration" and "Linux-x86_64_11-Release_Config

Re: [Libreoffice] PostgreSQL-SDBC: Windows & MacOS X porters sought

On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 12:22:17AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > About internal PostgreSQL: > 1) Cygwin has packages (...) that seem rather >unpatched and to be built with a rather plain "./configure && >make". (...) > 2) MacOS X, I dunno. Actually, both MacPorts and fink have new-

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows (MSVC) incremental build is broken.

Hi Bjoern, Bjoern Michaelsen píše v Čt 01. 12. 2011 v 09:21 +0100: > > And reverting > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=28275d470f3a062cfa27d72bbf89328af1e83c68 > > fixes it. I haven't pushed the revert yet since I don't know the > > intent of this commit. > > Please pu

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] bidi/rtl languages (cosmetic change only)

On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 11:37:44PM +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote: > Hi, > > Following Andrads's commit to the bidilanguages variable (http:// > cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id= > 93cf9e1f2b4a269dfe4fd90945dd2f7c50277db5), I've made a small cosmetic patch as > these languages are RTL (w

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows (MSVC) incremental build is broken.

Hi, Jan Holesovsky píše v Ne 04. 12. 2011 v 11:44 +0100: > > If we want beta1 to be better than beta0, we can't require > > people having to make clean after each edit, and rebuild from scratch > > (effectively making the fix-test-commit cycle take one day). > > Then again - if we want to have b

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.0 beta0 available

Hi *, with some delay, version is now on the mirrors, and reasonably release-noted here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/3.5.0/Beta0 Please amend with new findings. Thanks a lot for your help, -- Thorsten pgptUBF1ms3wL.pgp Description: PGP signature

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 35784, which changed state. Bug 35784 Summary: EDITING - unable to update postgresql databases using postgres SDBC driver https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35784 What|Old Value

[Libreoffice] PostgreSQL-SDBC: Windows & MacOS X porters sought

Hi, So, PostgreSQL-SDBC is now in libreoffice master branch, but not enabled by default. We now need a developer with access to a Windows build and a developer with access to a MacOS X build to build and make the necessary adaptations, if any. Configure with: --enable-extension-integration --ena

[Libreoffice] Decoview: improve comment about checkmark mirroring

This patch improve the comments related to checkmark mirroring: it seems to be needed to compensate the lower level mirroring performed by a device with mirrored graphics. Please verify that I understood correctly the code (can graphics really be mirrored at a lower level?) and take into account

[Libreoffice] Decoview cleanup #7 - Remove unused button styles

The attached patch removes from DecorationView some unused (according to "grep -r BUTTON_DRAW_ *, performed at top level) button styles with the related code. Matteo >From e5097ddf0c1753b44b2a23dcfb51ba761b899adf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matteo Casalin Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 23:20:40 +010

[Libreoffice] License statement: Matteo Casalin

All of my present and future contributions to LibreOffice are available under the terms of the LGPLv3+/MPL licenses, until further notice. Matteo Casalin ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailma

[Libreoffice] Howto get new property to file

Hi all, I've started implementing the new draw object property "line cap". I have expanded the line property dialog already. But the draw object (in my tests a line) does not get the property. There is no property in Basic and no property in the saved file. I have changed the files: /core/of

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] bidi/rtl languages (cosmetic change only)

Hi, Following Andrads's commit to the bidilanguages variable ( http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=93cf9e1f2b4a269dfe4fd90945dd2f7c50277db5), I've made a small cosmetic patch as these languages are RTL (which for them we need bidi support). Comments? Kaplan From 1621b0d4defd2

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#42286, do not shrink the selected area (2)

Hello, To give you a background, this "extend range downward" functionality was Thanks for your explanation. Following the remark of Eicke, I ended up with 3 possible patches :-/ which all have small differences in behaviour. I have a favorite, but do not want to choose alone. Please push th

Re: [Libreoffice] setting the background color of an Edit

Hello Kohei, > You are almost there.  IIRC there is some quirk with setting a > background color with the Edit control; you need to set fore ground > color before setting the background color in order to change the > background color.  No idea whether it's a bug or not (I think it is), > but that'

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] a few more translations

I am an American, but have lived in Germany for several years. My German is pretty decent, but probably not fluent. I do not wish to debate , or have an argument on the finer points of the meanings of some of these words: - actually, or - currently, or - as a matter of fact, or - literall

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] LibO 3.5.0 Beta 0 First assessment

Cor Nouws schrieb: AFAIAC, no need to say sorry for that. It's part of our work that we carry that happily, isn't it, Rainer ;-) Hi, Yes! I did not want to blame anyone, I only regretted our mishap to catch one of the worse ones of the Source stages of development. And for me Cor's idea Con

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] RESET - BACK button text and function interchanged

Hi Rainer Since you asked not to discuss on the Bug Tracker here is my opinion: The function "Back" doesn't make any sense. If the idea is to Undo the values that you changed and you haven't Saved then you already have the Cancel button. If the goal is to return to LO default values then the use

[Libreoffice] RESET - BACK button text and function interchanged

Hello, may I ask you to comment in Bug 43515 - [Task]: RESET / BACK button text and function interchanged and Bug 43516 - LOCALHELP: Help text for BACK button describes RESET always when yo

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Decoview cleanup #6 - take advantage of cleanup #5 for more cleanups

Hi, please find attached a patch that takes advantage of previous patch to cleanup the code calling ImplDraw2ColorFrame. The attached patch is contributed under LGPL3+/MPL1.1 license. Matteo >From e0167dc0598f011f22728fb77e5b23be2f273781 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matteo Casalin Date:

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Decoview cleanup #5 - embed (erroneusly) external support function

Hi, please find attached a patch that removes the ImplDraw2ColorFrame support function from OutputDevice and moves it into DecorationView, which is its only caller. This function did not logically fit into OutputDevice, anyway. The attached patch is contributed under LGPL3+/MPL1.1 license.

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Decoview cleanup #4 - embed support function

Hi, please find attached a patch which rewrites the DrawButton function. The attached patch is contributed under LGPL3+/MPL1.1 license. Matteo >From 2c0dde2798b800ee3fb95c4e54fa9b7f693727cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matteo Casalin Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 12:18:49 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/4

[Libreoffice] [PATCHES] Decoview cleanup - remove unneeded header

Hi, please find attached a patch continuing DecoView cleanup, simply removing an header file no longer needed (since my previous cleanup patch) The attached patch is contributed under LGPL3+/MPL1.1 license. Matteo >From 7a77d1c5fb3447a664c2167f434c310cc4499709 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Fro

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] a few more translations

On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 12:14:57AM -0800, Mike Whiteley wrote: > I respectfully disagree with some of your recommendations. I can be mistaken. Let's discuss the points where you disagree. > As long as the basic point is getting across, I think it is probably > good enough. Yes, but: > This wil

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows (MSVC) incremental build is broken.

Hi Kohei, Tor, Tor Lillqvist píše v So 03. 12. 2011 v 12:56 +0200: > > Kendy (this time CC'd), please don't commit this stuff. It breaks > > incremental build on Windows, making debugging Windows impossible. > > Hear, hear. If we want beta1 to be better than beta0, we can't require > people hav

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows (MSVC) incremental build is broken.

Hi Kohei, Tor, Tor Lillqvist píše v So 03. 12. 2011 v 12:56 +0200: > > Kendy (this time CC'd), please don't commit this stuff. It breaks > > incremental build on Windows, making debugging Windows impossible. > > Hear, hear. If we want beta1 to be better than beta0, we can't require > people hav

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] a few more translations

This might have been a bit harsh. It seems like you have taken more time on this, and your versions are better and more clear than mine, so good job there. I'll try to be a little more careful in my subsequent translations. Mike On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Mike Whiteley wrote: > I respect

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] a few more translations

I respectfully disagree with some of your recommendations. Are you fluent in German? As long as the basic point is getting across, I think it is probably good enough. This will take forever, if we have to be 100% consistent with the machine version, and these have to go through 3 levels of review