if we use that simol it might break other versions of db.
On (2011-01-10 10:16), Gökçen Eraslan wrote:
> Perşembe 06 Ocak 2011 günü (saat 20:03:28) Petr Mladek şunlar?? yazm??şt??:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this fixed the problem described in the attached mail.
> >
> > Gökçen, Robert, could you please tes
Perşembe 06 Ocak 2011 günü (saat 20:03:28) Petr Mladek şunları yazmıştı:
> Hi,
>
> this fixed the problem described in the attached mail.
>
> Gökçen, Robert, could you please test it and sign it out for
> libreoffice-3-3 branch?
>
No, I only have __db185_open_4008 symbol in libdb.so, here is th
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 09:52:31AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 03:21 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > Is that the end of the build?
>
> Yup, good news.
>
> > (Where did the nice graphics go? ;) )
> >
> > Thank you! How do we continue with this?
>
> Well, make dev-ins
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:32:40AM +0100, David Tardon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 08:09:17PM -0300, Kayo Hamid wrote:
> > diff --git a/sw/source/core/access/acccell.cxx
> > b/sw/source/core/access/acccell.cxx
> > index dbd1b51..2479c5c 100644
> > --- a/sw/source/core/access/acccell.cxx
> > +
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 08:09:17PM -0300, Kayo Hamid wrote:
> diff --git a/sw/source/core/access/acccell.cxx
> b/sw/source/core/access/acccell.cxx
> index dbd1b51..2479c5c 100644
> --- a/sw/source/core/access/acccell.cxx
> +++ b/sw/source/core/access/acccell.cxx
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ SwAccessibleC
Sending for review.
revol_
diff --git a/sw/source/core/docnode/ndsect.cxx
b/sw/source/core/docnode/ndsect.cxx
index a7168c2..f93fe95 100644
--- a/sw/source/core/docnode/ndsect.cxx
+++ b/sw/source/core/docnode/ndsect.cxx
@@ -387,6 +387,7 @@ SwDoc::InsertSwSection(SwPaM const& rRange, SwSectionDat
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 22:25 +0100, Julien wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is a patch for some cppcheck cleaning in sw
> Compiling was ok
Looks reasonable to me, pushed, thanks for these
> + 1 -exec replaced by xargs
ditto.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
L
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 20:37 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote:
> And here another patch for sc/inc/funcdesc.hxx and related source
> files,
...
>(using casts when forced to use String originally because of ResId).
Kohei will probably want to have a look at these, but as an aside, how
about adding somet
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 09:24:51PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 20:55 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > OK for libreoffice-3-3?
>
> yeah, go for it IMO.
k, pushed.
Grüße/Regards,
René
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@li
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 20:55 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> OK for libreoffice-3-3?
yeah, go for it IMO.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hello,
Here is a patch for some cppcheck cleaning in sw
Compiling was ok
+ 1 -exec replaced by xargs
Julien
(LGPLv3+ / MPL)
commit 8bce9aee2348d6d34f190b2409390010b9a88e79
Author: Julien Nabet
Date: Sun Jan 9 22:19:39 2011 +0100
Some cppcheck cleaning
diff --git a/sw/source/core/acces
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 16:21 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is a patch for some cppcheck cleaning in sc
> Compiling was ok
Looks good, so pushed. Thanks for this.
I did decide afterwards to remove two of the methods that cppcheck said
could be "const" seeing as they were actually e
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 23:50 +, Andy Hearn wrote:
> The cursor, when on a post-it note, now can go out of view when Joe
> User scrolls, and is correctly brought back into 'focus' if the user
> types something.
>
> But however, this patch shouldn't be pushed at all - I suspect that
> the hack whi
Am 07.01.11 23:24, schrieb Dan Corneanu:
> Hi,
> supposing I would venture in writing a content provider implemented in
> C++ , to make a CMIS repository accessible to libreoffice,
> what library should I use for accessing the web services on the server?
>
> Best regards,
> Dan.
Hi,
I'm not aware
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 23:52 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> instead of translating comments, this time I removed lot's of comments like
Looks good, all pushed, thanks for these.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 23:14 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I started with a fresh clone this evening and reapplied my changes. So
> this patch is meant for pushing :-)
Seems to be a duplicate of the earlier ones which I already pushed, so I
think these are up to date now. Thanks fo
Hi Christoph,
Christoph Noack wrote on 2011-01-09 02.51:
During the last days, I got the impression that it might be helpful to
share some ideas how a future collaboration with the LibreOffice Design
Team could look like. And, to know what you consider to be helpful when
we talk about UX and Vi
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 02:06 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a bunch of cleanup on base.
Looks good to me, pushed, thanks for this.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listi
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 17:29 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote:
> - Is this strategy: "writing new type, adding casts to old type,
> replacing occurrences, removing old type" appropriate?
Well, whatever works I guess, personally I prefer a big-bang approach.
i.e. remove the class in one fell sweep. Depre
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 14:26 +0100, Anders Jonsson wrote:
> These three patches remove large blocks of commented code in sdk,
> components and libs-gui respectively. All code has been commented out at
> least since 2005.
Looks perfectly reasonable to me, especially the comment which suggests
the ch
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 14:08 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> PS : the 2 sendings with my yahoo.fr address seemed not having worked.
They showed up eventually, all pushed now, thanks.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 02:09 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I used xargs instead of -exec to reduce chmod spawning.
Seems reasonable, pushed, thanks for this.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freed
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 08:46 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> I don't understand too the part about hiding something from cppcheck,
> wouldn't it be better to declare a new bug to cppcheck tracker ?
Quite possibly
> But perhaps I misunderstood something
I reckon we really should be calling cppcheck w
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 02:53 +0100, Christoph wrote:
> some more translations.
Looks reasonable to me, pushed, thanks for these.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 00:21 +0100, Christoph wrote:
> Only one comment in this file.
Seems reasonable to me, pushed. Thanks for this.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libre
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
--- Comment #58 from tester8 2011-01-09 12:13:11 PST ---
Nominate Bug 32052 - hat, vector and tilde doesn't appear.
With this bug LibreOffice is unusable for physicist and some other scientists.
It is regression to OO 3.2.
--
Configure bugmail:
Hi
I have been working with sc/inc/funcdesc.hxx, and this header defines
four closely related classes, but all the implementation of these
classes is in sc/source/core/data/global.cxx together with the
implementation of a number of other classes. This makes it confusing
to find the implementations
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
tester8 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||32052
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.free
Hi,
see the attached patch, the Mozilla plugin still says "OpenOffice path"
(yes, even without .org!) when invoked. Should be changed,
And I think we shouldn't show this at all unless someone wants to debug
this so I added #idef OSL_DEBUG_LEVEL > 0 around it.
OK for libreoffice-3-3?
Grüße/Regar
Hello, I have seen a new design at libreoffice.org and it's looks very
good, congrats! But it seems miss set a blank background.
revol_
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreof
And here another patch for sc/inc/funcdesc.hxx and related source
files, changing even more occurrences of (deprecated) String to
OUString. I also changed the uses of these variables/functions to use
OUString instead (using casts when forced to use String originally
because of ResId).
Please revie
Hi
Please review and apply if appropriate this patch:
I have replaced four public (deprecated) String variables of
ScFuncDesc in sc/inc/funcdesc.hxx by OUString and changed all uses of
these variables to use OUString instead. Most places by using relevant
methods for OUString, and a few places (wh
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 05:39:31PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 04:40:06PM +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > Not trying to hijack the thread here but what is Ubuntu doing about
> > LO i know its supposed to be part of their next release instead of
> > OOo, but norma
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 04:40:06PM +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Not trying to hijack the thread here but what is Ubuntu doing about
> LO i know its supposed to be part of their next release instead of
> OOo, but normally they get packages from upstream Debian, is someone
> working on getting i
> Hi Jean,
>
> On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 21:11 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
>> Jonas wrote:
>>> Assuming someone cares to implement it... and you're are welcome to
>>> step up to the plate :)
> ..
>> I strongly disagree : it is you who must not to destroy what is working
>> very well.
> Jean
Not trying to hijack the thread here but what is Ubuntu doing about LO i
know its supposed to be part of their next release instead of OOo, but
normally they get packages from upstream Debian, is someone working on
getting it in Debian?
On 01/09/2011 04:11 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Hi al
Hello,
Here is a patch for some cppcheck cleaning in sc
Compiling was ok
Julien
PS : when cppcheck indicates that a boolean is not initialized, what is
recommended to choose ? true, false or it depends on the context ?
(LGPLv3+ / MPL)
commit dd245b64fb571acffb4dc580d0f6098a0cf5037b
Author: Ju
Hi all,
I think that we should have a webpage where Linux distributions who are
packaging LibO, could list what changes they made compared to the
"official" build by TDF.
I see two main advantages :
- for users and helpers : they will know easier if a problem comes from
LibO or from packaging
- f
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 21:30 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
> The 2nd patch just removes some white spaces and leftover conflict
> markers. I hope the two patches together are fine...
I fiddled these patches a bit to apply and remove the lines that just
changed whitespace and some other cleanup
Le 06/01/2011 19:33, leif a écrit :
> When I see the Startcenter I see the Insert to the most right position
> and not as expected between View and Tools. This occurs only when the
> start center is visible. When I start or open a document the position is
> correct.
>
> Screendump:
> http://picasaw
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 18:26 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've just fixed and attached a patch to
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32790
>
> intended for 3.3. I would appreciate it if someone who is experienced
> in the writer mail merge code to review and approve
Hi,
a user gave me a hint on our de-users-list about a posible regression in LO
(OOo)
3.3.0 to OOo 3.2.1. I made some tests and can confirm a regression. The
background
color of a hatching is not exported anymore.
I created an issue for it and sent a notice to the releases-list of OOo.
http://
42 matches
Mail list logo
