On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Mansour Moufid wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>> 0001 and 0002 look like non-starters. They change a published
>> interface. Code that followed the documented interface of
>> evhttp_*_set_max_*_size that would have worked befor
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> 0001 and 0002 look like non-starters. They change a published
> interface. Code that followed the documented interface of
> evhttp_*_set_max_*_size that would have worked before will no longer
> work with these changes applied. We serio
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Mansour Moufid
wrote:
Hello, Mansour, and thank you for the patches.
0001 and 0002 look like non-starters. They change a published
interface. Code that followed the documented interface of
evhttp_*_set_max_*_size that would have worked before will no longer
w
Changes to the evhttp_connection_set_max_* functions in `http.c'.
Changes to the evhttp_set_max_* functions in `http.c'.
Check if the `evhttp_new_object' function in `http.c' returns NULL.
Changes to the `evhttp_maybe_add_content_length_header' function in
`http.c'.
Correct some `evbu
