On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> If you're looking for fun http exercises, btw, check out the
> bugtracker entries on sourceforge for http-related bugs. Niels is
> supposed to be looking for those to see about fixing them as
> appropriate before 2.0.x-rc can come out, but
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Felix Nawothnig
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 13:50 -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>> > If you have no objections, feel free to apply it.
>> Done, with minor tweaking to make it C90-compliant.
>
> Great. Sorry about the C99 thing - why don't you add the appropriate
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 13:50 -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> > If you have no objections, feel free to apply it.
> Done, with minor tweaking to make it C90-compliant.
Great. Sorry about the C99 thing - why don't you add the appropriate
compiler switch to the build system? Wouldn't have happened then
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Felix Nawothnig
wrote:
> Forwarding this discussion from Bug #3006553 to the ML:
For reference, that's
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3006553&group_id=50884&atid=461322
> If you have no objections, feel free to apply it.
Done, with minor tweaki
Forwarding this discussion from Bug #3006553 to the ML:
First of all, I've attached a new version of my patch to this Mail -
this one just allows NULL reasons for evhttp_response_code and changes
evhttp_send_error to display the actual reason. I did not however change
the parameter semantics from
