On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Simon Perreault
wrote:
> On 2010-09-09 17:28, Simon Perreault wrote:
>> Would this be the right fix?
>
> Argh, git-send-email didn't do what I wanted it to do. Here's the patch
> in attachment. Sorry.
This looks good to me. Merging it. Thanks for tracking this do
On 2010-09-09 17:28, Simon Perreault wrote:
> Would this be the right fix?
Argh, git-send-email didn't do what I wanted it to do. Here's the patch
in attachment. Sorry.
Simon
--
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server--> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0
Would this be the right fix?
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@freehaven.net with
unsubscribe libevent-usersin the body.
Hello,
I do this:
bufev = bufferevent_socket_new(...);
bufferevent_setcb(bufev, foo, ...);
bufferevent_setwatermark(bufev, EV_READ, ...);
When input exceeding the read watermark is received, foo() is called
even though I did not call bufferevent_enable(bufev, EV_READ).
Why is this?
Inside foo(
