On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Shuo Chen wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Is it possible that libevent 2.0 utilizes timerfd and/or signalfd
> provided by recent Linux kernels?
>
> - timerfd features a better timing resolution (microseconds) than
> epoll (milliseconds), and
I wouldn't mind support for th
Hi there,
Is it possible that libevent 2.0 utilizes timerfd and/or signalfd
provided by recent Linux kernels?
- timerfd features a better timing resolution (microseconds) than
epoll (milliseconds), and
- signalfd makes signal handling like reading a file descriptor
Seems libevent already uses
