On Aug 19, 2010, at 1338 PT, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
I haven't done much with 2.x, but personally a two way core/extra
split
seems just fine. IMO splitting things into a twenty pieces or adding a
dozen --disable-foo options just makes things confusing and hard work
for developers, packagers an
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 04:05:32PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 04:27:47PM -0700, Gilad Benjamini wrote:
> >>
> >> What are the major benefits of 2.0 ?
> >
> > From my point of view, a lot of convenience code
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 04:27:47PM -0700, Gilad Benjamini wrote:
>>
>> What are the major benefits of 2.0 ?
>
> From my point of view, a lot of convenience code was added which many
> large programs already written to the libevent 1.4 A
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Gilad Benjamini
wrote:
> Nick,
> Thanks for the answer and the detailed document.
> Out of the different open source projects out there using libevent, which
> ones have already moved to 2.0 ?
Tor supports some but not all of the new 2.0 stuff, and will move to
us
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 04:27:47PM -0700, Gilad Benjamini wrote:
>
> What are the major benefits of 2.0 ?
>From my point of view, a lot of convenience code was added which many
large programs already written to the libevent 1.4 APIs would already
have, some APIs were cleaned up, and the library w
n.net] On Behalf Of Nick Mathewson
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 6:14 PM
> To: libevent-us...@freehaven.net
> Subject: Re: [Libevent-users] To upgrade or not to upgrade - that is
> the question
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Gilad Benjamini
> wrote:
> > We
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Gilad Benjamini
wrote:
> We have working Linux application using libevent 1.4
> We are now beginning work on a new version, which would include, among other
> things porting our code to Windows.
>
> Theoretically, it looks like a good point in time to upgrade our l
