> Hi, Ross! The discussion on this ticket should bring you up to speed.
>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3436038&group_id=50884&atid=461324
>
>> Also, what is the reason that the default signal backend cannot have
>> different event bases receiving different signals?
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Ross Lagerwall
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the status of the signalfd branch? It seems like the main
> problem with the implementation is the use of sigprocmask whose behavior
> isn't specified in a multithreaded environment and from my testing,
> doesn't have the de
Hi,
What is the status of the signalfd branch? It seems like the main
problem with the implementation is the use of sigprocmask whose behavior
isn't specified in a multithreaded environment and from my testing,
doesn't have the desired effect. Even using pthread_sigmask wouldn't
help since it only
