On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
> I don't believe that we defined whether setting the timeout to NULL
> will cancel any currently pending timeouts. That is, if the timeout
> has already fired, and the corresponding even
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
> I've filed a bug with all details and sample code that demonstrates
> the problem on Github:
> https://github.com/libevent/libevent/issues/16
>
> Nick: can you verify if my understand of the expected behavior is
> correct. That is, if I set ti
I've filed a bug with all details and sample code that demonstrates
the problem on Github:
https://github.com/libevent/libevent/issues/16
Nick: can you verify if my understand of the expected behavior is
correct. That is, if I set timeout to NULL, any existing timers should
get cancelled and no fu
