On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>>> For more background, folks should see
>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation and
>>> http://fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>> For more background, folks should see
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation and
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CryptoConsolidationEval
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wi
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> For more background, folks should see
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation and
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CryptoConsolidationEval
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Nss_compat_ossl looks sweet.
By the way, OpenSSL does
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Oscar Koeroo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a bit a licensing question. Might not be the most popular topic, but
> I'll give it a shot.
>
> Currently the recent Fedora Core's and Red Hat Enterprise 6 force libnss-ssl
> on the software. Even libcurl is not made available i
Hi,
This is a bit a licensing question. Might not be the most popular topic, but
I'll give it a shot.
Currently the recent Fedora Core's and Red Hat Enterprise 6 force libnss-ssl
on the software. Even libcurl is not made available in various SSL flavors,
like on other platforms, e.g. Debian and O
